Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations strongm on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Wording help 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

dgillz

Instructor
Mar 2, 2001
10,038
US
I am trying to get a customer to buy a small, already developed application to solve her business issue,and this sounds SO AWKWARD. Please let me know your thoughts on how to word this:

this application will help us to achieve AR Payment imports, much more quickly and cheaper than we could ever develop it.

Software Sales, Training, Implementation and Support for Macola, eSynergy, and Crystal Reports

"What version of URGENT!!! are you using?
 

Code:
It will be much quicker and less expensive to achieve AR Payment imports with this application than if we develop it ourselves.

Good luck!
 
Using this application to import AR payments will be far more cost effective and quicker than trying to develop our own system.

HTH :)

<Do I need A Signature or will an X do?>
 
Using this application will be cheaper, quicker and less risky than developing our own equivalent.

I want to be good, is that not enough?
 
How about:

this application will help us to achieve AR Payment imports much more quickly and cost effectively than a custom solution.

[wavey]
 
This application imports AR Payments quickly, correctly, and cost effectively. Building a solution costs time and money, and might take even longer to get it right.

[santa]Mufasa
(aka Dave of Sandy, Utah, USA)
[I provide low-cost, remote Database Administration services: www.dasages.com]
“Beware of those that seek to protect you from harm. The cost will be your freedoms and your liberty.”
 
Is the customer trying to convince her colleagues in this statement? If so, then here's my stab at it:


Choosing this application will enable us to import AR Payments in a swift, cost-effective manner that would be difficult to match if we were to develop a solution on our own.
[tab]

~cdogg
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Einstein
[tab][navy]For posting policies, click [/navy]here.
 
Hi,
If for a customer, your use of our seems a little odd..how about:
This application, which has been shown to meet your needs for AR payment imports, will be a more effective use of your resources then having a custom application built and tested.



[profile]

To Paraphrase:&quot;The Help you get is proportional to the Help you give..&quot;
 
Turkbear, I'm not sure you need the commas, there in that sentence, at least in my opinion, on this day in September, when I'm posting on tek-tips, and while wearing clean socks.
[wink]

--

"If to err is human, then I must be some kind of human!" -Me
 
==> I'm not sure you need the commas
I'm sure he does since it's a non-restrictive clause.

-----

This application saves both time and money compared to developing an in-house system towards our AR import needs.

--------------
Good Luck
To get the most from your Tek-Tips experience, please read
FAQ181-2886
As a circle of light increases so does the circumference of darkness around it. - Albert Einstein
 
tcsbiz and GSCaupling have excellent responses.

Most of the others start with an uneeded passive voice clause.
These two are clear, consise and the easiest to follow.

Greg
People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use. Kierkegaard
 
Traingamer said:
Most of the others start with an uneeded passive voice clause.
I see only one case of passive voice:
...which has been shown...
The other grammatical issue that jumps out is the use of then where than is appropriate:
...more effective...then having...
...cheaper then developing...

[santa]Mufasa
(aka Dave of Sandy, Utah, USA)
[I provide low-cost, remote Database Administration services: www.dasages.com]
“Beware of those that seek to protect you from harm. The cost will be your freedoms and your liberty.”
 
I haven't seen this addressed yet - going back to the OP, I think the main reason it "sounds SO AWKWARD" to your ear is that you expect "more quickly" and "cheaper" to be parallel. The is, it should either be "more quickly and more cheaply" or "quicker and cheaper".

That change alone might not give you a perfect solution, but I suspect it sounds less awkward to you.

Santa, I was going to point out the 'then' vs. 'than' problem if you hadn't. That's a pet peeve of mine.

[tt]_____
[blue]-John[/blue][/tt]
[tab][red]The plural of anecdote is not data[/red]

Help us help you. Please read FAQ 181-2886 before posting.
 
Santa, you are correct about the passive voice. There was only one - my mistake. [blush]

Most of the examples are too wordy. They have distracting clauses rather than a simple subject and verb.

Another simple, to-the-point statement:

(Name of application) is effective, cheaper and faster to implement.

Simplify. Simplify. Simplify.

Greg
People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use. Kierkegaard
 
Great observation on the nonparallel structure anotherhiggins.
(Name of application) is effective, cheaper and faster to implement.
effective at what?
This simple sentence lacks sufficient reference to understand the context of the effectiveness.

cheaper and faster than what?
If you're going to use comparative adjectives (cheaper, faster), then you need to indicate the two things being compared.

It's great advice to simplify, but not at the expense of meaning.

I also don't think it's a good idea to mix the standard adjective effective with the comparative adjectives cheaper and faster.



--------------
Good Luck
To get the most from your Tek-Tips experience, please read
FAQ181-2886
As a circle of light increases so does the circumference of darkness around it. - Albert Einstein
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top