Search results for query: *

I think we are on the same page, yes! My thinking on the matter is, if the Concentrator doesn't know the route, it will send it to the Gateway of last resort, That Gateway can ping both clients, so perhaps it won't send a packet back throught the port from which it came(?), Just guessing...

Thanks for the response, As far as the trace, I only get as far as the Public IP address of the Concentrator. I was pondering that as the client is on the "outside" interface and calling another client on the "outside" interface, whether this could be allowed,(My technical limitations will not...

I am struggling to find out why two VPN Clients cannot see each other either through Ping, trace, ftp etc The VPN in question is on the main VLAN (100)and I am using a /22 subnet with the third octet being used to identify LAN users (192.168.100.x and VPN users(192.168.101.0) I am using a Cisco...

Have you looked into Cisco Meeting Place? we have this and it works very well

Okay, I appreciate your feedback, Drother, All that achieved was adding a 6666 to the end of the dialled number, so that didn't work. pndscm: I have used your method, but instead of a CTI Port, I have added 6666 in the directory numbers, used the alerting name of Helpdesk, and then call...

We have an external contractor providing a service, which involves providing an internal ext for users to call. So I have set up a route pattern to forward these calls out into the PSTN. Route Pattern 6666. Discard digits: predot Prefix Digits (Outgoing Calls): 9001xxxxxx My problem is that...

I am using the ASDM to manage my ASA5520 Firewall On the Firewall Dashboard there is a "Top 10 Access Rules" and the rule taking both second and third place on the inside interface is Rule#0: Source:any, Dest:any, Service: IP, Action: Permit Now as it is rule 0 I have not configured this...

Many thanks to both of you for your imput, I have downloaded the documents from Nortel as suggested and I think I should be able to run with it now, If I run into any Gotcha's, I will be sure to let you know. I do appreciate you taking the time to help. Regards

I have a Option 11 with an NT5D51 MICB Card installed giving me 30 Conference Ports. I need to increase my ports by adding another NT5D51 to extend this to 60, so my questionS are; 1. Can this be done to give me a 60 port Bridge or would I have 2 x 30 bridges? 2. How would I configure this on...

I Guess the answer is no!, we do not have an internal CA. The IT guys have looked at Certificate Authority on their workstations which tells them it is not an installed service. Is there a way I can bootleg one as it is for one VPN Group only?

Hello everybody I need to start using CA Certificates on my Cisco 3000 Concentrator as a client equipment cannot authenticate using group authentication. Up to now I have only used pre shared keys so I am totally unfamiliar with certificates although I have read up on them and understand the...

Could the VPN Group that you are configured to, have a maximum connect time of 60 minutes?

It's quite easy when you know how isn't it? :-) Thank you very much for your help "iwontremember" I really appreciate it

I am running CCM 4.1 and have been tasked with adding a second line to an existing device. I have checked up on the Cisco Documentation and where it states I go into device >phone select device and then, "In the Directory Numbers list, click an unassigned line, such as Line 1 or Line 2. The...

Well you could always go to http://www.dslreports.com or similar sites to measure your connection. T

Thanks for the prompt response. So to summarise, I will just leave the secondary as active and re-integrate the Primary as Primary and it will by design, default to backup and cross load the Active units config. Many Thanks for your help on this.

Gentlemen I have two ASA5500 working as Primary and Secondary. Last week the primary unit crashed due to a hardware failure, and now the secondary unit is "Primary" or "In Office". My question is, I have a replacement ASA5500 unit and was wondering what would be the easiest way to integrate it...

Many Thanks for al your help and advice we have connected the two switches via Fa ports and this has stopped the problem until we get a new switch cable

Many thanks for your responses, reading up on the problem, it appears to be leaning toward a faulty cable(s). Peter, I would be very interested in the resolution of your problem.

This Morning I awoke to find that the following message was being generated at around 4000 MPH Anyone any idea how to resolve it? The cables have been checked and traffic is not affected. Any other information required, please ask!! I did note that the software image on the "master" is older...