I would look for QSIG option. I don't know much about Definity, but for 3300 you need to have proper licensing set including digital link license.
Please be more specific, which part of the problem you need help with?
With the lack of detail, I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish, but if you want to use the T1 interfaces on the respective switches to network them together, you definitely need to use Q.SIG for your ISDN PRI protocol. You also need to think about who's going to be the NT and LT side, as well as the A or B end for messaging.
21785, you really need to explain your issues better, i have seen many posts, and it seems that most of us reading the ones you put on do not explain what you have done so far, so it is difficult to give you pointers, it appears you are totally reaching versus trying to resolve things. for the record, qsig is a multi vendor protocol.
Lt=Line side Nt=Network side.
-Which do you need to be, the choice is yours. If you cannot establish layer 1 (flashing green) then toggle either lt or nt. The address control is irrelevant. It is part of the link descriptor when you chose isdn node as your integrated digital access. In your Imat, or protocol assignment, you need to check off whether or not you are the master (network) or slave (no checkmark).
1-what stage are you at?
2-what have you tired?
you need to give us something to work with here.....
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.