Has anyone had trouble with slowness transfering e-mail between Exchange 5.5 and 2K3 in a mixed-mode environment? I have people reporting that mail is sometimes as much as 10 min. behind. The network is all on the same LAN without any slow links (<10 Mb/s). Thanks.
It is definitely something related to her profile, so I am beginning to think that it could be the caching since that is stored in local profile application data. I am going to check it out when she is available again, thanks for the idea.
I have a user that we just upgraded to Outlook 2K3. When she tries to create a new E-mail, forward or reply she gets an error-
The messaging interface has returned an unknown error. If the problem persists, restart Outlook.
We looked it up on Microsofts site and can find an almost exact...
Thanks for the idea, but I might need to clarify. This isn't for internal users, but when using OWA from outside the co. I want to direct https://webmail.business.com to my front end server, and I don't know if I can do that from within Exchange, or if I have to create another virtual server...
Two things to check.
There is a huge list of programs that have problems working after XP sp2, search Microsofts site and you can find the list (it's over 50 programs).
The other thing is that if you have caching enabled in Outlook 03 make sure that you are working on-line, and haven't told it...
I'm currently using a FE-BE Exch2k3 server arrangement and am trying to get OWA set up. I have it so that it requires a SSL connection, but currently you can only get there by accessing https://servername/exchange or /public.
I kind of messed up by not checking this before I got my SSL...
What Johnny99 said is correct. In 5.5, there was one copy of every e-mail stored in the Database and pointers that told each mailbox where to lool. In 2k and 2k3, there is one copy of each message saved per storage group, as well as one message per store.
So if you have 2 SG and 2 stores/SG...
We wanted to do the same thing where I work, but couldn't because our DMZ wasn't a part of the same forest as the domain where the backend servers would be. I don't know if that is the issue, but something you might look into.
The way we did it is to create additional user accounts for the mailboxes that weren't the user's primary, and to give that user access to the other mailboxes.
A better way to explain this is to say that the user had mailboxes A, B, C, and D. A was his personal, and B, C, and D were mailboxes...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.