I don't know of anyplace you can download it either. But do a web search for it and you'll find plenty of vendors.
An upgrade should save you a couple hundred dollars though.
I agree with the others. As always, the best advice is to shop around.
Just to add ... the upgrade from 6.0 to 9.0 will be worth every penny of what you pay. If you do a lot of VFP programming (and I know you do), you'll recoup the money in terms of improved productivity.
Mike
__________________________________
Mike Lewis (Edinburgh, Scotland)
I can't say on 8 to 9, but the development environment is much better from 6 to 9.
The reporting in 9 is a little flakey - using the compatibility arrangements you do get a few odd results, too difficult to detail - a bit of fiddling seems to fix them.
I do all new projects/apps in VFP9 and I think it's well worth the investment.
To answer your question, you need to divide VFP versions into two groups: 6.0 and below; and 7.0 and above.
Going from any version of the first group to any version of the second group is a must-have upgrade. You get lots of excellent producticity improvements - not least of which is Intellisense - plus many worthwhile enhancements to the language and object model. The upgrade will be worth every penny.
Going from any version of the second group to any other (later) version (e. 8.0 to 9.0) is less compelling. You've already got Intellisense and similar productivity features. If you do upgrade, you'll still get a lot of benefits, but whether it is worth the cost and effort really depends on what features are important to you, and how much time you can devote to learning them.
For me, 9.0 is far and away the best version yet, and was well woth the cost and time to upgrade. But your situation might be different.
I would add that if you are going to go to the trouble of upgrading (and it's really not that much trouble), you might as well go with the latest version.
Griff,
I certainly don't agree that 9.0 is flakey. On the contrary, I've had far fewer problems with it than with any other version.
What's your experience.
Mike
__________________________________
Mike Lewis (Edinburgh, Scotland)
Sorry ... I mis-read your previous comment about reporting. I personally haven't had any problems with conversion of reports, but I understand what you mean.
Mike
__________________________________
Mike Lewis (Edinburgh, Scotland)
Converted reported reports (5/6 to 9) exhibit a few anomolies - all of which I have been able to solve by messing about in a pretty much undefined manner... cutting and pasting into new reports mainly.
Actually, I've has a *few* problems with forms too - but nothing serious and only with conversions.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.