We have six Windows 2000 servers with 135 GB of data to backup. The servers are typically around 400 Mhz,dual processors, 10K-15K scsi raid 5 disk, with 1GB of RAM. The tape drive is an Ultrium. We are running Open file agents, SQL agents and exchange agents on an 10/100 backbone.
The good news is that when we backup a local SQL DB file the backup flies (throughput is over 1,600 MB/Min!).
The bad news is that this accounts for only 4GB of the 135GB to backup. The entire backup throughput is about 100 MB/Mins so it takes the job takes forever to complete.
The size of the server (RAM, disk or CPU) seems to have little impact on the speed of the backup. The local drives are backed up at about 200 MB/Min while remotes throughput is usually less than 100 MB/Min. We have experimented with different NIC cards and settings (full/half,auto...) to little avail. Turning off the anti-virus software did help, but we are still slow. We have not done any registry hacks.
I was really hoping to get the entire system throughput over 200 MB/min. Is this unrealistic?
The good news is that when we backup a local SQL DB file the backup flies (throughput is over 1,600 MB/Min!).
The bad news is that this accounts for only 4GB of the 135GB to backup. The entire backup throughput is about 100 MB/Mins so it takes the job takes forever to complete.
The size of the server (RAM, disk or CPU) seems to have little impact on the speed of the backup. The local drives are backed up at about 200 MB/Min while remotes throughput is usually less than 100 MB/Min. We have experimented with different NIC cards and settings (full/half,auto...) to little avail. Turning off the anti-virus software did help, but we are still slow. We have not done any registry hacks.
I was really hoping to get the entire system throughput over 200 MB/min. Is this unrealistic?