JonnySouthport
MIS
The Peter Principle exists when someone is thrust into a position which requires skills the candidate does not have and is thus doomed to failure. It is a well known phenomena at all levels of traditional management, and one that seems to have adapted itself to the new digital age, if not effortlessly, then with a bang.
Unfortunately, during this priceless period of time that we nerds can truly win back our stolen lunch money and interest from the meat-headed, swirly giving, babe getting jocks, therein lies one problem: Eventually, one of us will be in a position of leadership, either voluntarily or otherwise. For those of us that have been totally techno-focused since the time of conception, this blessing can be a curse.
For example, let's take the subject of micromanagement. Naturally, us techies, by nature, are and must be very detail oriented. Thus, when all of a sudden we are made managers, we tend to be micromanagers for the same reason. But swirly's aside, many of the best athletes from our youth gone by are now highly effective managers because they know how play on and/or lead a team to greatness. More importantly, they know not to micromanage. I know because I used to work for one.
So, with olive branch in hand to all the good athletes & leaders I've playfully dissed here, I would like to ask: What are the best ways to make the transition from being detail oriented to being an effective manager, sans micro?
Ubi o ubi est mayem sub ubi?
Unfortunately, during this priceless period of time that we nerds can truly win back our stolen lunch money and interest from the meat-headed, swirly giving, babe getting jocks, therein lies one problem: Eventually, one of us will be in a position of leadership, either voluntarily or otherwise. For those of us that have been totally techno-focused since the time of conception, this blessing can be a curse.
For example, let's take the subject of micromanagement. Naturally, us techies, by nature, are and must be very detail oriented. Thus, when all of a sudden we are made managers, we tend to be micromanagers for the same reason. But swirly's aside, many of the best athletes from our youth gone by are now highly effective managers because they know how play on and/or lead a team to greatness. More importantly, they know not to micromanage. I know because I used to work for one.
So, with olive branch in hand to all the good athletes & leaders I've playfully dissed here, I would like to ask: What are the best ways to make the transition from being detail oriented to being an effective manager, sans micro?
Ubi o ubi est mayem sub ubi?