Nokia e63 / e75 sip client on ipo

[mdekruif]

Hello,

We have installed several nokia e63 / e71 phones with the native sip client on ipo. This works great.

these settings must be made in the phones and ipo:
Menu | Tools | Settings |Connection |Sip settings | New SIP profile

Profile name: [your name]
Service profile: IETP
Default access point : [your access point]
Public user name: [extension number]@[ip address ipo]
Use compression: no
Registration: always on
Use security: no
Proxy server:

Registrar server
Registrar server adress:ip address ipo]
Realm: [extension name]@ [ip address ipo]
User name:[extension number]
Password: [login password user]
Transport type: auto
Port: 5060

Menu | Tools | Settings |Connection |Internet telephone | New profile

Select your added SIP profile

Menu | Communication | Internet tel. | Options |Settings

Change default call type to Internet call


In the IPO create a default use and SIP extension, and enable the sip client settings in the system tab.

There is one thing to change:

On the Extension tab disable Force Authorization


These settings works great for the e63/e71. On the e75 phone it won't work. It seem something to do with the contact header in the SIP message:

log of a e71 phone
765332mS SIP Reg/Opt Rx: phone
REGISTER sip:voip.xxxx.nl SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP xxx.133.64.1:49660;branch=z9hG4bKpag7up1f51hc7ldh7f7hvoc;rport
From: <sip:337@voip.xxxx.nl>;tag=g5r7up2evthc6om17ckh
To: <sip:337@voip.xxxxx.nl>
Contact: <sip:337@xxx.133.64.1:49660>;expires=3600
CSeq: 969 REGISTER
Call-ID: cr9_p2oioIf_WzIFHhc8rROvaxcDLe
User-Agent: E71-1 RM-346 210.21.006
Max-Forwards: 70
Content-Length: 0

765333mS Sip: (f51e5c60) SendSIPResponse: REGISTER code 200 SENT TO xxx.133.64.1 49660
765334mS SIP Reg/Opt Tx: phone
SIP/2.0 200 Ok
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP xxx.133.64.1:49660;branch=z9hG4bKpag7up1f51hc7ldh7f7hvoc;rport
From: <sip:337@voip.xxxxx.nl>;tag=g5r7up2evthc6om17ckh
To: <sip:337@voip.xxxxx.nl>;tag=efbf24ed05fb5104
Call-ID: cr9_p2oioIf_WzIFHhc8rROvaxcDLe
CSeq: 969 REGISTER
User-Agent: IP Office 5.0 (8)
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, INFO, SUBSCRIBE, REGISTER, PUBLISH
Contact: <sip:337@xxx.133.64.1:49660>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:44:32 GMT
Expires: 180

the log of a e75 phone:
1008853mS SIP Reg/Opt Rx: phone
REGISTER sip:voip.xxxxx.nl;transport=UDP SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP xxx.133.64.1:65228;branch=z9hG4bKs422nubb4thc7i8onmrd8la;rport
From: <sip:251@voip.xxxxx.nl>;tag=u422nua6ephc6ncsnmr5
To: <sip:251@voip.xxxxx.nl>
Contact: <sip:Y0XUZBhTqxmnU4SqVa6J@xxx.133.64.1:65228;transport=UDP>;expires=3600
CSeq: 111612 REGISTER
Call-ID: zVYH-tZhoIeyIXSSQefi4dXLuDQDEe
Max-Forwards: 70
Content-Length: 0

1008853mS Sip: (f51e5c60) SendSIPResponse: REGISTER code 400 SENT TO xxx.133.64.1 65228
1008854mS SIP Reg/Opt Tx: phone
SIP/2.0 400 Bad Request
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP xxx.133.64.1:65228;branch=z9hG4bKs422nubb4thc7i8onmrd8la;rport
From: <sip:251@voip.xxxxx.nl>;tag=u422nua6ephc6ncsnmr5
To: <sip:251@voip.xxxxx.nl>;tag=64376981737b6f2e
Call-ID: zVYH-tZhoIeyIXSSQefi4dXLuDQDEe
CSeq: 111612 REGISTER
User-Agent: IP Office 5.0 (8)
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, INFO, SUBSCRIBE, REGISTER, PUBLISH
Content-Length: 0

especially the contact field are different:
e71:
Contact: <sip:337@xxx.133.64.1:49660>;expires=3600
e75:
Contact: <sip:Y0XUZBhTqxmnU4SqVa6J@xxx.133.64.1:65228;transport=UDP>;expires=3600

On the e75 there is no extension number in the contact field. therefore the ipo gives a BAD REQUEST.
Does somebody know how to solve this?

 

[Bas1234]

Also in the IPO on the extension Voip tab;

tick; RE-Invite Supported/Use Offerer's Codec

___________________________________________
It works! Now if only I could remember what I did...

Dain Bramaged
___________________________________________

 

[telcotechavaya]

Hi there, not sure if this is of any help, but I had problems with SIP extensions and trunks trying to use RTP ports outside of the 49152 to 53246 set under System-LAN1-VoIP tab.
Reading above, speech path problems etc. No audio will happen if they don't try streaming in the same range ay?

Cheers,

Chris