mattKnight said:
Isn't the provable truth an absolute defence?
Most of the time, but not necessarily. It depends on your jurisdiction. In the U.S., the U.K. and a lot of other places, probably.
But you would have to be very careful in what you say. If you very circumspectly said, "He hasn't yet paid my last bill to him.", you could defend your statement at truth. Start blowing off steam and publicly say something like, "He's a deadbeat who never pays his bills", and and you've screwed yourself -- all he would have to do is show one bill he paid recently and your statement is false. Even innocuous statements, if they contain the least "spin" instead of straight facts, can be problematic if the plaintiff has a good lawyer.
But I think the more important question is, "Will winning a libel lawsuit be worth the trouble, time and expense it will take to win it?"
Mark Twain once said something along the lines of "Better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt". By the time the dust from the libel suit settled, you'd be out even more money than you were before, and all you would have to show for it was an expensive lesson in civics -- from the inside.
As I see it, you're much better off keeping your mouth shut and filing a suit.
Want the best answers?
Ask the best questions!
TANSTAAFL!!