sbankscharles
Technical User
In over 15 years of managing different IP Office I've only used sequential groups so I hope someone can (please) help me see the trees in the forest.
I have a system that I recently took over that was not managed very well. The complex I'm in has three different reception desks. Each desk has their own extension with the main number routed to a group. That group has the extension of each desk in the user list, which is the way I've always done my groups. The extension that the public uses to call a desk is not the actual extension of the desk. That extension is a group which then has the actual extension in the user list. Then, in the overflow are the two group extension for the other desks.
I don't understand why they would have used the overflow of a group instead of using the user list None of the senecios for using an overflow seem to apply to my situation.
Thanks
I have a system that I recently took over that was not managed very well. The complex I'm in has three different reception desks. Each desk has their own extension with the main number routed to a group. That group has the extension of each desk in the user list, which is the way I've always done my groups. The extension that the public uses to call a desk is not the actual extension of the desk. That extension is a group which then has the actual extension in the user list. Then, in the overflow are the two group extension for the other desks.
I don't understand why they would have used the overflow of a group instead of using the user list None of the senecios for using an overflow seem to apply to my situation.
Thanks