Here's what I have:
Two MICS connected via T1 (PRI enabler on both). Each has its own CP150.
System A is MICS 7.1 with a PRI from AT&T and 60 DID numbers.
System B is MICS 7.0 with 12 POTS lines.
I just had three users move from the building with System A to the building with System B. They want to keep their DID numbers.
My Hasty "solution" (work around) was this: I enabled their old phones to CFNA and CFB to their new extension numbers, then put the phones off hook so the CFB would take effect immediately. This worked in that their new phone on System B would receive calls that came into System A via their DID. Unfortunately, when the new extensions CFNA kicked in, the call would go to the General Delivery mailbox instead of their new voicemail box (calls directly to their new extension go to VM as expected).
Here's the path of the call: Call comes in on DID 555-5113, system sees received digits of 113 (three digit extensions on both sides). Line 173 is Target line that takes Received numer 113 and is Private to 113 (prime set for Line 173 is also 113). DN 113 has Line 173 as Ring only, so call rings to DN 113. CFNA/CNB says forward to 375. 3 is destination code for calls to System B (absorb length is 0), and is routed over the T1 to system B. System B sees received digits 375. Line 275 is Target line that takes received number 375 and is private to DN 375 (with prime set 375). DN 375 has Line 275 as Ring only. DN 375 rings...Four rings no answer? OK, CFNA to 349 (DN for System B CP150). CP150 has mailbox number 375 defined and activated with extension 375 assigned to it, but places it in the general delivery mailbox...Grrr.
I'm not sure why that happens, but ultimately, it would be nice to not waste three phones and three extensions on System A just to make CFNA/CFB work, even if I can fix this above. (I believe I am correct in that there must be a phone connected to the DN for the CFNA/CFB to work.)
Is there a better way to accomplish this? I'm thinking it could all be done by routing, but I can't get my brain around it.
Thanks!
---------------------
I'd rather learn from other peoples mistakes than have them learn from mine!
Two MICS connected via T1 (PRI enabler on both). Each has its own CP150.
System A is MICS 7.1 with a PRI from AT&T and 60 DID numbers.
System B is MICS 7.0 with 12 POTS lines.
I just had three users move from the building with System A to the building with System B. They want to keep their DID numbers.
My Hasty "solution" (work around) was this: I enabled their old phones to CFNA and CFB to their new extension numbers, then put the phones off hook so the CFB would take effect immediately. This worked in that their new phone on System B would receive calls that came into System A via their DID. Unfortunately, when the new extensions CFNA kicked in, the call would go to the General Delivery mailbox instead of their new voicemail box (calls directly to their new extension go to VM as expected).
Here's the path of the call: Call comes in on DID 555-5113, system sees received digits of 113 (three digit extensions on both sides). Line 173 is Target line that takes Received numer 113 and is Private to 113 (prime set for Line 173 is also 113). DN 113 has Line 173 as Ring only, so call rings to DN 113. CFNA/CNB says forward to 375. 3 is destination code for calls to System B (absorb length is 0), and is routed over the T1 to system B. System B sees received digits 375. Line 275 is Target line that takes received number 375 and is private to DN 375 (with prime set 375). DN 375 has Line 275 as Ring only. DN 375 rings...Four rings no answer? OK, CFNA to 349 (DN for System B CP150). CP150 has mailbox number 375 defined and activated with extension 375 assigned to it, but places it in the general delivery mailbox...Grrr.
I'm not sure why that happens, but ultimately, it would be nice to not waste three phones and three extensions on System A just to make CFNA/CFB work, even if I can fix this above. (I believe I am correct in that there must be a phone connected to the DN for the CFNA/CFB to work.)
Is there a better way to accomplish this? I'm thinking it could all be done by routing, but I can't get my brain around it.
Thanks!
---------------------
I'd rather learn from other peoples mistakes than have them learn from mine!