Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations dencom on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
cluster support
- Thread starter ElHedi
- Start date
a060463xyz
IS-IT--Management
Yes !
You need the Networker Poweredition and two storagenode Licenses.
Fibrechannel attached Library is recomended.
You may also need dds licenses (one per Tapedrive that should be shared between storagenodes).
You need the Networker Poweredition and two storagenode Licenses.
Fibrechannel attached Library is recomended.
You may also need dds licenses (one per Tapedrive that should be shared between storagenodes).
a060463xyz
IS-IT--Management
Hi 605,
you are right, only one active Networker Serverprocess is allowed on a cluster, the second node can be an active Storage Node. So there is some "activity" on both cluster nodes.
So it depends on the definition of active/active.
you are right, only one active Networker Serverprocess is allowed on a cluster, the second node can be an active Storage Node. So there is some "activity" on both cluster nodes.
So it depends on the definition of active/active.
- Thread starter
- #5
special thanks for your quick answers
by active/active I mean the following :
We thought initially about failover so we installed networker on cluster.
Now we have one server that backs up data and the other that is waiting all the time,
My hope is to use it also so I minimize the charge on the first and in the same time my solution won't stop if the first stops.
thaks
by active/active I mean the following :
We thought initially about failover so we installed networker on cluster.
Now we have one server that backs up data and the other that is waiting all the time,
My hope is to use it also so I minimize the charge on the first and in the same time my solution won't stop if the first stops.
thaks
To a060463xyz:
You are right - that's why i do not like term like active/active at all unless you add the environment or task information.
To ElHedi:
Using the other node as storage node is possible. However, this depends also on other configurations like
- clients' storage node lists
- pools
- and especially the device selection for a pool
Worst case you must dynamically reconfigure with nsradmin.
You are right - that's why i do not like term like active/active at all unless you add the environment or task information.
To ElHedi:
Using the other node as storage node is possible. However, this depends also on other configurations like
- clients' storage node lists
- pools
- and especially the device selection for a pool
Worst case you must dynamically reconfigure with nsradmin.
- Status
Similar threads