2 T's and 2 Ethernet Interfaces

[evildik]

Basically what i am trying to do is route E0 Traffic to go out S0 and E1 traffic to pass out S1

Network View is the following:

S0 S1
\ /
\ /
ROUTER
/ \
/ \
E0 E1


Does there need to be a default ip route? Do i need two?
And is the following configuration correct?
Also I dont want E0 traffic to go through the S0 line to get to E1
The following is the running config.

Thanks for your help in advance. This is a puzzling problem

interface FastEthernet0/0
description Circuit ID
ip address 64.161.245.193 255.255.255.192
ip policy route-map FE
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface Serial0/0
description Circuit ID
ip address 69.105.204.114 255.255.255.252
encapsulation ppp
ip policy route-map S0
no fair-queue
service-module t1 clock source internal
service-module t1 timeslots 1-24
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
description Circuit ID
ip address 64.161.246.1 255.255.255.192
ip policy route-map FE1
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface Serial0/1
description Circuit ID
ip address 69.105.204.118 255.255.255.252
encapsulation ppp
service-module t1 clock source internal
service-module t1 timeslots 1-24
!
no ip http server
ip classless
!
!
access-list 1 permit 64.161.245.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 2 permit 64.161.246.0 0.0.0.255
!
route-map FE1 permit 20
match ip address 2
set ip next-hop 69.105.204.117
!
route-map FE0 permit 10
match ip address 1
set ip next-hop 69.105.204.113
!
route-map S1 permit 20
set interface FastEthernet0/1
!
route-map S0 permit 10
set interface FastEthernet0/0
!

 

[vipergg]

I would think 2 static routes would do what you want , point it to whatever address is on the far end of the serial links .

 

[Warcorp]

This senario is setting the default route by setting next hop based on the route map by ip segment so there is no need for a static route per se. Remove the route map from the serial interfaces as you do not need them. At that point any address matched by the acl should activate the next hop address by the route map.

 

[evildik]

I appreciate all of your input. Will this work with destinations outside of the routes that the router is aware of?

Thanks again for the help

 

[Warcorp]

Yes because setting the next hop for each of the connections specifies the default route.