Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations SkipVought on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. jmcooney

    Database extract from Avaya system

    Hi, I have a need to extract out the station detail from an Avaya system (migrating site to Cisco Call Manager). In the Nortel world I can run a full TNB into a text file and then run through an Excel macro and magically I have a perfect report. In the NEC world, I have to export out a bunch...
  2. jmcooney

    Turn off MWI

    I have a Nortel CS1000 r4 w/Avaya Modular Messaging (integration is with digital set emulation). I have a situation where the light is lit indicating there is a message, but the MWI database indicates the light is off and there are no messages in the mailbox. After trying to resync the MWI and...
  3. jmcooney

    IPT Telephony

    Can anyone recommend any good sites for information on IP Telephony? Specifically I am looking for some info on killer applications for IPT, what telephony stuff still isn't as good in IPT compared to TDM and are there any different legal ramifications for implementing IPT in different parts...
  4. jmcooney

    Should I see the "sent" name when enabling msgo?

    How do you know to skip the first three? Is there somewhere in the NTPs or flips that tell you this? Maybe I am supposed to skip some on the CLNG and CLED too????
  5. jmcooney

    Should I see the "sent" name when enabling msgo?

    I apologize in advance for the length of the data --- did not find a means of using an attachment. >ld 96 DCH000 .set msgo 63 mon 2 .enl msgo 60 .dis msgo 60 .enl DCH017 .enl msgo 63 . DTC001 DCH 63 OMSG SETUP REF 00000017 CH 18 23 TOD 8:43:38 CK 0E89C546 HEADER:01 01 00 36 08 01...
  6. jmcooney

    Should I see the "sent" name when enabling msgo?

    Hmm I assumed the DISP would have converted out to the name (as it was the only difference between the PRI sending name and the one not). I have more output, but only put in two different call set ups. What IE would represent the name? As far as the Hex to ASCII, even with the link provided...
  7. jmcooney

    Should I see the "sent" name when enabling msgo?

    Thanks guys. Now I see something, but I am a little embarrassed to say I can not figure out the conversion (I checked the Internet for a hex to ASCII conversion table, but I am not able to figure it out -- for example -- I know the calling number is 416 something and expect to see 10 hex codes...
  8. jmcooney

    Should I see the "sent" name when enabling msgo?

    My previous question had to do with sending name and not wanting to, which I backed my way into an answer (changing NCNA to no from the default of yes). However, I wanted to prove this by looking at the d channel messages. Unfortunately, I do not see the name on either PRI (I expected to see...
  9. jmcooney

    Sending Name Display (and don't want to)

    Thanks for your response. I had already checked the RCAP -- it is ND2 on both. With regard to your second suggestion, I am looking for a little clarification: are you suggestion to enable the messaging to see if I am passing both on each and then I would know for sure the provider is...
  10. jmcooney

    Sending Name Display (and don't want to)

    First, I apologize that I may have sent a similar question to this one before, but I was unable to locate it when I did a search on the site. We have two PRIs that appear to be configured exactly the same on our side (as far as the route and the ADAN D-channel info are concerned). Not sure if...
  11. jmcooney

    CPND info passing to the carrier

    It appears the LD 95 name info along with the full telephone number is being sent to the called party end when using a new PRI we installed this past week. The original PRI does not pass the name info -- only passes the telephone number. I have asked the carrier to check on this and they have...
  12. jmcooney

    Strange (and probably why bother)

    Thanks for the first two replies. DES in the CPND block is already NO. Since both the new and old phones, both of which are of the type 3904, use the same CPND block, would it have been possible that this could be the change required if they both behave differently? Do you think I need to...
  13. jmcooney

    Strange (and probably why bother)

    During the roll-out of an additional 70 phones (and a new PRI with new phones using the new PRI), we noticed behavior that was different from previous behavior. During testing because we had ported the numbers from one carrier to another (now both are the same), we noticed that when dialing the...
  14. jmcooney

    NTPs in electronic form (pdfs)

    Does anyone know where I can get up to date NTPs in electronic form? A while back I was able to pull them off a site, but they were a bit out of date (they were helpful anyway, but now I do not seem to be able to access the site). This was the site, but I am not able to access it with any...
  15. jmcooney

    Terminal Settings

    Our old Opt 11 dumb terminal just bit the dust. We have connected a PC using a very nonstandard terminal emulation package -- emulating VT220. Unfortunately because of internal software distribution issues, we can not load any other emulation software. The PBX works fine, but when going to...
  16. jmcooney

    Is it possible to direct access route & member?

    On the NEC PBX one can access a specific trunk by *010001 which is route 10 member 1. I know on the Nortel you can dial the acod for a route, but not sure if you can direct access a specific trunk within the route (and if you can, how you do it).
  17. jmcooney

    Data passing from PBX to Voice Mail

    It turns out that the PBX data does not pass nicely if the CPND is greater than 23 characters. As soon as I shortened the name under 23 characters, it worked as it should.
  18. jmcooney

    Data passing from PBX to Voice Mail

    Thanks for the suggestions: - we have already removed/rebuilt the voice mail box - we have already removed/rebuilt the set (on the same TN) - we have confirmed that the extension comes up properly on another set Yes, 2424 is the correct destination for the Avaya voice mail.
  19. jmcooney

    Data passing from PBX to Voice Mail

    At the request of acewarlock, here is the TNB: DES 08V004 TN 020 0 02 09 TYPE 3904 CDEN 8D CTYP XDLC CUST 0 FDN 2424 TGAR 1 LDN NO NCOS 6 SGRP 0 RNPG 15 SCI 0 SSU LNRS 16 XLST CLS CTD FBD WTA LPR PUA MTD FNA HTA TDD HFA GRLD CRPD STSA MWA LMPN RMMD SMWD AAD IMD XHD IRD...
  20. jmcooney

    Data passing from PBX to Voice Mail

    We have a Nortel CS1000 connected to an Avaya Modular Messaging (via Digital Set Emulation). A user reported that they never get any voice mail messages. Using the tracing software on the Avaya, I can see the caller never gets to the individual's voice mail because the voice mail reports...

Part and Inventory Search

Back
Top