Search results for query: *

6.1.3 on solaris 8 attached via LIBSTATION to an stk-9310 silo. no networker problems except some of our pre 5.5 clients needed to get upgraded. knock on wood

From the following quote: " We are using two Sun E4500 which get a peak transfer of about 70 Megs/sec. Theoretically more would be possible, but nsrmmd uses so much CPU on the machine." from jkalbus (TechnicalUser) Feb 15, 2002 How was this limit determined??? Are you saying added...

levw Who is We? We recommend the customers to run "nsrck -L6" weekly. dmayes Why are you running nsrim -X before or after the touch of /nsr/mm/nsrim.prv ?

Concur with goeze. A procedure exist for renaming clients, if not done, you could be stuck with going to old name and having new name as alias. Good luck!

Got the following from my support vendor. The following is a Primus(R) eServer solution: ID: legato21368 Domain: primus_owner Solution Class: solution Fact ------- NetWorker 6 Fact ------- Solaris 2.6 Fact ------- Solaris 2.7 Fact ------- Solaris 2.8 Symptom ------- Aborting client...

See what the last touch of nsr/mm/nsrck-prv is? ls -la on file. Is the associated time near the the start of group that fails??? It could that the Legato networker "nsrck -MX" resource hog is sucking up all resources and not allowing your backups to complete. I found this process to be...

I am running on Solaris and moved from 5.1 to 5.5.1 to 6.0.1 to 6.1.1 (with special patches to minumize nsrjb core dumping) to 6.1.2 (with a workaround job). I probably shouldn't put this in writing, but I am now content with 6.1.2. 6.1.2 experience and needed workaround...

Thanks, nsrinfo will give them another option except for those privledge restrictions. They liked the saveset reports too. Just hope they don't make too many assumptions with saveset reports.

The dbas don't know the saveset is, does nsrinfo require? Maybe, I'll look into nsrinfo further. Thanks for referral. They just have a list of files they want to delete (reduce size of fulls) if hathey ve been backed up. I just sent them link to saveset reports, that might meet their needs...

Our dbas have asked for a way other that nwrecover gui to determine if log files have been backed up? I think this would be possible with a script using the recover command, but wondered if someone had already scripted same. If you have scripted same, please provide.

6.2 NT is available. Unix to be available. I got the Unix 6.2 nsrjb as a patch due to issues were we having with hung nsrjb processes.

Using 6.0.1 problem starts as noted below in cut from daemon.log and results in drive being hung until a refresh is done. When we do fulls on the weekend one to three drives usually end up in this failed state. 02/10/02 18:43:31 nsrd: media warning: /dev/rmt/9mbn writing: Bad file number...

ag100 (MIS) Sometime ago you (ag100 (MIS)) wrote ==> "As for the NT system recovery, I do it a bit differently, .....NTBCK already installed... It usually only takes 20-30 minutes to create the secondary OS before we start restoring. Keep in mind, there are a few quirks with the...

Is your problem like the link below if a tape has been labeled &quot;blank&quot; already? <http://web1.legato.com/lefaq/html/blankbarcode.htm.> This was how I explained our very similar issue, last August. Unfortunately, the suggestions in same had no impact for us. Might work for you. I was...

We had that problem sometime ago and it corresponded to an upgraded to 5.5.2. We spent tons of time trying to figure it out. Issue was resolved by replacing hand and camera in our atk9710 juke box.

Sounds like it needs another tape and it can not find one for respective client that can be overwritten

I would contact Tech Support at Legato to be sure but 6.0.1 may be a just a patch to 6.0. See if patch exists at legato web site. I think a release was done because they really didn't want anyone upgrading to 6.0 due to issues with conversion of db.

New User: How do I find thread 480-28797? which deals with this very question

To backup a remote site servers, we are conidering use of consolidation? Incremental backups are very small and it just seems like it would be quicker. Does anyone have experience with same???

New User: How do I find thread 480-28797? which deals with this very question