Search results for query: *

I looked into this a little further yesterday and was able to find a work around. Just to review, I was looking for a way to have a Linux server on two VLANs (the default and VLAN 5) and corresponding subnets. The server would have direct access to each VLAN/subnet, allowing it to use two...

I bet you are." In the most good natured way: I'll take that bet. ;-) "Did you disable it in the startup script in your linux? Perhaps /etc/rc.d/init.d/" Nope. There was no need as routed isn't installed. Just to be sure, I ran a find. Nothing. In the documentation you reference, it makes...

I'm not using routed on the server. Just static routes for the two VLANs. These routes are created when the interfaces are brought up (ie. I had no chance to screw them up). Interestingly, I've ran tcpdump on the server. It receives pings to the "wrong" address from the other VLAN, but doesn't...

It's not all that inconvenient, and you are right that the access via the local subnets gets full throughput. But you'd be surprised how often one tries to access a host via the wrong subnet and then goes off on a wild goose chase. (I spent about an hour on such a goose chase yesterday.) In my...

That's exactly what I'm trying to do. Here is my motivation: The server is connected to the network with a 4X GigE aggregate link (using a Linux bonding device, like EtherChannel). If I go through our router, then one of the subnets can only access the server at 1XGigE. We could solve this with...

Here's a fun problem: I have two VLANs (A & B), each with a subnet of its own. I have a server that is connected to both VLANs, so it has an address on each subnet. If I ping the server's address on A from a machine on VLAN B, no go. Swap A and B in the last sentence and you get another true...

It is not my impression that RADIUS necessarily requires clear text password transmission for authentication. At least, not according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RADIUS. There is the issue that non-password information is transmitted in the clear. But his can be avoided. Something to else...

Good point regarding just setting a static IP. I'd neglected to put that detail into my description. We can set MAC ACLs on our routers and switches to deal with that. Funny, I'd always wanted to do the actual shaping by subnet and had never thought of just using the MAC directly. That would...

Here's the situation: At our facilities, we have two classes of user: VIPs (very important persons) and NIPs (not important persons). We would like to prioritize all VIP traffic so that it doesn't get delayed by NIP traffic. We have no problems prioritizing traffic once machines are organized...

Yup. That was the problem. Hilarious! I reworked the router this morning, removed all the unused ports, and corrected the descriptions. Set up an ordinary generic shaper on the GigabitEthernet interface to the LAN and it works just as you'd expect. On to CBWFQs. Thanks Minue. I've slapped my...

Obviously, I don't know this network very well. I was assuming that it was set up how it is supposed to be. The router is definitely NATing. The role of the DMZ is on GE0/0 is that it is unfinished and doing nothing useful. That may change today. It looks like you are right about GE0/1 not...

I just tried spewing traffic the other direction with IPerf. It gets 5.28 Mb/s too. I'll dump my whole config below, but let me describe my network in words here: This is for a small school with a gigabit LAN. On the Cisco 2821, GigabitEthernet0/1 connects to the school's LAN and uses the...

Thanks for the reply Minue. The interface to the outside world is FastEthernet0/0/3. Gi0/1 is to the LAN. But yes, I did make that mistake yesterday. Just for completeness, here's the configuration for FastEthernet0/0/3: interface FastEthernet0/0/3 description Supernet switchport mode...

Working with a 2821 router, I can't get shaping to have any affect. Our service provider polices traffic to around 5.5Mbps and that's what I see, even when trying to shape to 500kbps. Here is the interface: interface GigabitEthernet0/1 description LAN no ip address ip mask-reply no ip...

Ok. I don't know exactly what happened. But the changes finally took effect. I've been looking around a lot, but haven't actually done anything that would have triggered a change. I suspect that the GAL is updated on a weekly basis, but can't yet confirm it. I'm looking forward to learning more...

Thanks Zelandakh, Iain and Pat. Although my problem remains unsolved, your replies have helped confirm that I'm looking in the right area. I'm sorry. I should have been more clear. Completely my fault. Actually, it's just the snail mail address (not the email address) that needs changing. Not...

I'm not sure if this is an Exchange issue, an Outlook issue, or a GAL issue. My apologies if this is in the wrong place. The issue involves the Address Book in Outlook. If I look at the properties of anybody whose entry comes from the GAL, I can't edit them as a regular user. This makes perfect...