Search results for query: *

5 server Citrix farm - Windows 2000 SP3, Citrix Metaframe XP 1.0 SP/FR1 running on all servers. Local data store. They are in a Windows NT4-domain, with one PDC and one BDC. NetWare Client is also installed on each server, because of applications running in NetWare enviroment. Novells product...

As I mentioned, this works in Windows 2000. But not in Windows XP!

I apologize too, I wrote wrong subject for this thread. I´m frustrated about this! Very irritating! :-)

bcastner - You don´t have the same "problem"?

Thanks, but that did not do it. This is the problem: C:\>ping www.microsoft.com Pinging a562.cd.akamai.net [213.161.82.42] with 32 Reply from 213.161.82.42: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=49 ..... C:\>ping -a 213.161.82.42 Pinging 213.161.82.42 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 213.161.82.42...

I cannot resolve names from IP-addresses in Windows XP. I use "ping -a" command. Same command works in Windows 2000 on same lan with same wins/dns. Anyone with ideas?

After applied Citrix Metaframe XP SP2, without setting the Feature Release Level to level 2, I´ve discovered a huge problem. Each time I try to add, in CMC, a specific user from a Domain the IMA-service on the server I´ve connected CMC to dies. I´ll have to manually restart the IMA service...

I don´t know if this could be an answer that works, but try this anyway: To add support for localy DNS-servers, locate this file: "c:\program Files\checkpoint\secureremote\database\userc.C" Add this entries under Options: :dns_encrypt (true) :dns_xlate (true)

Nice Thorsten, sorry for sending tou a bad url. But the page was available when I sent it. We are not using ZenWorks in any case combined with Citrix. But we are planning to conifgure Metaframe XP for NDS with Zenworks 4. In the ordinary user enviroment we are using Zenworks 3. Do you have any...

Hello, We have a small Citrix farm combined with a Windows NT 4.0 domain and Novell NetWare enviroment. For a long time we were depended on logging on to desktop to all Citrix Servers. Otherwise the processors would rise to the top. I didn´t find anything at all on the web that mathed this...

Hi Thorsten, Have you tried to apply the fix to NWC 4.83 SP1? http://support.novell.com/servlet/tidfinder/2964018 / Micke