Hi Guys,
We have a customer on R11 with a Windows Server installation of One-X Portal. We have upgraded them to the latest R11 version, and run the Log4j patch, but when they do a search of the C drive for Log4j they still see version 2.12.1 in the One-X directory, which is one of the vulnerable versions. Do you know what this patch is designed to do? Should it have been upgraded to a none affected version (2.17.0 I believe), or have they mitigated the vulnerability in some other way?
I need to reassure the customer that the patch has resolved the vulnerability.
Thanks!
Joe
Joe Newton
We have a customer on R11 with a Windows Server installation of One-X Portal. We have upgraded them to the latest R11 version, and run the Log4j patch, but when they do a search of the C drive for Log4j they still see version 2.12.1 in the One-X directory, which is one of the vulnerable versions. Do you know what this patch is designed to do? Should it have been upgraded to a none affected version (2.17.0 I believe), or have they mitigated the vulnerability in some other way?
I need to reassure the customer that the patch has resolved the vulnerability.
Thanks!
Joe
Joe Newton