judgestone
IS-IT--Management
Here is my scenario that I am having problems with:
1. Users login to VPN using their vpn username and password as in config:
vpdn username XXXXX password *********
they obtain an ip address of: 192.168.60.XXX
The main pix ip address is 10.10.60.XXX and they could originally get anywhere on the 10.10.60.X network. All routes , etc were working no problem.
I have since created vlans for our network, and configured them in the VPN portion of the pix, and all networks can talk to each other, and get to the internet (Except for what Im about to ask or tell).
2. I configured an Access rule that allows (Outside)192.168.60.XXX to access (inside) 10.10.66.XXX (this subnet is where my files servers are located). Users can now logon to VPN and get to their files that are located on file servers. See config:
access-list outside_access_in permit ip VPNConnections 255.255.255.192 nssvrs 255.255.255.0
3. Here is my problem:
- As long as I leave this access rule in place, it changes my "NAT" to 10.10.66.X, versus dynamic 207.XXX.XXX.XXX and if I am on the server trying to access the internet, it will not allow me to, until I delete the access rule and change the NAT on the inside host address of 10.10.66.X, back to dynamic.
For now, this is really not a problem, due to the fact I still can access any resources internally and get from server to server, and all other vlans as long as it is internal; and I would rather my end user's be able to connect in versus me get out to Google from my servers.
The problem this is causing for me is I haven't yet put in an internal SUS server for Windows Updates, and I can't use Windows Update or Get my AV Updates from external sources to push out to my end user's.
Is there a way to allow the VPN user's access to my internal vlan 10.10.66.X and still have outside internet capabilites from the 10.10.66.X subnet? I can just delete and add the access rule as needed or put in an internal SUS server; but I haven't gotten that far, and my AV updates for my corporate server is what is bothering me.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
1. Users login to VPN using their vpn username and password as in config:
vpdn username XXXXX password *********
they obtain an ip address of: 192.168.60.XXX
The main pix ip address is 10.10.60.XXX and they could originally get anywhere on the 10.10.60.X network. All routes , etc were working no problem.
I have since created vlans for our network, and configured them in the VPN portion of the pix, and all networks can talk to each other, and get to the internet (Except for what Im about to ask or tell).
2. I configured an Access rule that allows (Outside)192.168.60.XXX to access (inside) 10.10.66.XXX (this subnet is where my files servers are located). Users can now logon to VPN and get to their files that are located on file servers. See config:
access-list outside_access_in permit ip VPNConnections 255.255.255.192 nssvrs 255.255.255.0
3. Here is my problem:
- As long as I leave this access rule in place, it changes my "NAT" to 10.10.66.X, versus dynamic 207.XXX.XXX.XXX and if I am on the server trying to access the internet, it will not allow me to, until I delete the access rule and change the NAT on the inside host address of 10.10.66.X, back to dynamic.
For now, this is really not a problem, due to the fact I still can access any resources internally and get from server to server, and all other vlans as long as it is internal; and I would rather my end user's be able to connect in versus me get out to Google from my servers.
The problem this is causing for me is I haven't yet put in an internal SUS server for Windows Updates, and I can't use Windows Update or Get my AV Updates from external sources to push out to my end user's.
Is there a way to allow the VPN user's access to my internal vlan 10.10.66.X and still have outside internet capabilites from the 10.10.66.X subnet? I can just delete and add the access rule as needed or put in an internal SUS server; but I haven't gotten that far, and my AV updates for my corporate server is what is bothering me.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.