Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations Chriss Miller on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
VB6 or VB.Net 1
- Thread starter CPUCurt
- Start date
> The beauty of VB.NET (since that is what actually started this thread....) is that both is possible there
I'll second that, although there are plenty of other beauties too.
As for multiple inheritance, there's a good deal of argument about its worth as well, since you have to keep track of the interfaces of each inherited class to make sure there's no conflicts in method definitions. Personally, I don't see lack of multiple inheritance as much of a handicap. Saves thinking, which I prefer to saving typing. (Perhaps that's abundantly clear from some of my posts?)
Bob
I'll second that, although there are plenty of other beauties too.
As for multiple inheritance, there's a good deal of argument about its worth as well, since you have to keep track of the interfaces of each inherited class to make sure there's no conflicts in method definitions. Personally, I don't see lack of multiple inheritance as much of a handicap. Saves thinking, which I prefer to saving typing. (Perhaps that's abundantly clear from some of my posts?)
Bob
Yep; already figured that one out from your posts.....
As for the multiple inheritance; some argue that it causes a lot of pain (in the head mainly) others argue that sometimes it can be very useful (I'm one of them latter people...). But it was not mentioned by me as ment to be a handicap (although it sometimes can be one), it was more to point out that you can aggregate multiple other classes, but you can not inherit multiple classes.
Greetings,
Rick
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question
