I have a Cayman router w/ 5 static IPs. On one of those IPs I have a PDC. On another one of the static IPs I've connected an SMC router w/NAT. I want to be able to establish a trust between the two PDCs.
I was able to setup a VPN from the PDC behind the SMC router w/NAT to the PDC attached to the Cayman, and though I couldn't browse the PDC, I was able to Map a drive to one of its folders that I intentionally shared for this test.
So I can setup communications between the two servers with RAS/VPN devices, but this just seems like a lame way of doing this. Both routers sit next to each other and both share the same WAN default gateway.
What I'm ultimately trying to do here is have two groups of users were Group A only accesses Server A, and Group B accesses both Servers A & B. I'm doing this because I need to run two instances of the same program, but they have to be on different subnets so that the one instance is not aware of the other instance.
Still a neophyte (neobyte?) after all these years!
I was able to setup a VPN from the PDC behind the SMC router w/NAT to the PDC attached to the Cayman, and though I couldn't browse the PDC, I was able to Map a drive to one of its folders that I intentionally shared for this test.
So I can setup communications between the two servers with RAS/VPN devices, but this just seems like a lame way of doing this. Both routers sit next to each other and both share the same WAN default gateway.
What I'm ultimately trying to do here is have two groups of users were Group A only accesses Server A, and Group B accesses both Servers A & B. I'm doing this because I need to run two instances of the same program, but they have to be on different subnets so that the one instance is not aware of the other instance.
Still a neophyte (neobyte?) after all these years!