People,
On my most recent project (a photo album), I noticed that the placed .jpg's, .tiff's & .psd's printed much darker than displayed on my monitor (Dell M992.) I knew it wasn't the fault of my printer, due to the fact that I had the correct media & other settings selected; & also the fact that colors & saturation print exact in other applications (Paint Shop Pro, etc.)
This problem brought out one of the weak spots in my digital imaging knowledge: monitor calibration vs. printing vs. video card vs. image application.
I've never been able to get a handle on this relationship.
In my System Config Utility, Adobe Gamma Loader (for both Illustrator & Photoshop) are unchecked in the Startup dialog. I thought this was the way to go, after I read the following in the help files of both Illustrator & Photoshop:
"Although Adobe Gamma is an effective calibration and profiling utility, hardware-based utilities are more precise. If you have a hardware-based utility that can generate an ICC-compliant profile, you should use that instead of Adobe Gamma."
I took this to mean that my video card (NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 420) set-up might be more precise.
In Illustrator, I've also never been able to go to View > Proof Setup, to select my monitor (as I'm able to do in Photoshop.)
So my questions here, are:
1) What is the best way to calibrate colors in order to have them print accurately (as displayed on the monitor?) Should I have Gamma Loader load? Should I look to my video card? Is there a setting in Illustrator that I am missing?
2) Can someone please point me toward some understandable tutorials on the relationship between Illustrator & the printer, display & video card on this issue?
Thanks very much,
mark4man
Dell Dimension 8250
Windows XP (Home Edition)
Intel 850E Motherboard & Chipset
Intel P4 2.53GHz CPU (512 KB L2 Cache, 533 MHz FSB)
512 MB PC1066 RDRAM
Dell M992 19" Monitor
Nvidia 64MB GEFORCE4 MX420 AGP
On my most recent project (a photo album), I noticed that the placed .jpg's, .tiff's & .psd's printed much darker than displayed on my monitor (Dell M992.) I knew it wasn't the fault of my printer, due to the fact that I had the correct media & other settings selected; & also the fact that colors & saturation print exact in other applications (Paint Shop Pro, etc.)
This problem brought out one of the weak spots in my digital imaging knowledge: monitor calibration vs. printing vs. video card vs. image application.
I've never been able to get a handle on this relationship.
In my System Config Utility, Adobe Gamma Loader (for both Illustrator & Photoshop) are unchecked in the Startup dialog. I thought this was the way to go, after I read the following in the help files of both Illustrator & Photoshop:
"Although Adobe Gamma is an effective calibration and profiling utility, hardware-based utilities are more precise. If you have a hardware-based utility that can generate an ICC-compliant profile, you should use that instead of Adobe Gamma."
I took this to mean that my video card (NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 420) set-up might be more precise.
In Illustrator, I've also never been able to go to View > Proof Setup, to select my monitor (as I'm able to do in Photoshop.)
So my questions here, are:
1) What is the best way to calibrate colors in order to have them print accurately (as displayed on the monitor?) Should I have Gamma Loader load? Should I look to my video card? Is there a setting in Illustrator that I am missing?
2) Can someone please point me toward some understandable tutorials on the relationship between Illustrator & the printer, display & video card on this issue?
Thanks very much,
mark4man
Dell Dimension 8250
Windows XP (Home Edition)
Intel 850E Motherboard & Chipset
Intel P4 2.53GHz CPU (512 KB L2 Cache, 533 MHz FSB)
512 MB PC1066 RDRAM
Dell M992 19" Monitor
Nvidia 64MB GEFORCE4 MX420 AGP