Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations strongm on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Subinterface shows down/down

Status
Not open for further replies.

ManagerJay

IS-IT--Management
Jul 24, 2000
302
US
I have defined a subinterface for Serial 1 numbered Serial 1.1. Serial 1 shows up/up, but serial 1.1 shows down/down.

What do I need to do in order to bring up the sub-interface?

Thanks for your help.



Jay
 
Here is addiitional information concerning the remote router configuration.

interface Serial1
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay lmi-type asni
interface Serial1.1 point-to-point
ip address 192.168.77.20 255.255.255.0
bandwdith 56
frame-relay interface-dlci 115
router eigrp 25
network 192.168.77.0

sh frame-relay map shows
Serial1.1 (down): point-to-point dlci, dlci 115(0x73,0x1C30)
status deleted

Following is information concerning the router I am attempting to connect to.

interface Serial1
ip unnumbered Ethernet0
encapsulation frame-relay
bandwidth 448
frame-relay lmi-type ansi
frame-relay map ip 192.168.40.129 115 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 192.168.77.20 115 broadcast


The ip address of Serial0 is 192.168.10.1.

Do the serial ip addresses all need to be on the same network, or have I missed something else here?

Thanks for your help.



Jay
 
The ip address of the remote router has to be in the same subnet as the local router. Instead of using ip unnumbered, I would create a subinterface on the remote router as well and give it an address like 192.168.77.21/24 Since your using a point-to-point link, i would also use a 30 bit mask
 
Is this a point to point or a Frame-Relay?
Lets make sure of the pipe so we can resolve the issue. Jeter@LasVegas.com
Fisher CCNA,(Routing)
UOP Student BSIT
[americanflag]
 
According to your frame-relay map info, it says your DLCI is deleted:
sh frame-relay map shows
Serial1.1 (down): point-to-point dlci, dlci 115(0x73,0x1C30)
status deleted

Issue the "show frame-relay pvc 115" and see if the status is still deleted. If so, call your frame circuit provider and tell them the dlci is not provisioned or is mapped incorrectly.
 
According to your frame-relay map info, it says your DLCI is deleted:
sh frame-relay map shows
Serial1.1 (down): point-to-point dlci, dlci 115(0x73,0x1C30)
status deleted

Issue the "show frame-relay pvc 115" and see if the status is still deleted. If so, call your frame circuit provider and tell them the dlci is not provisioned or is mapped incorrectly.
 
Here is the current network configuration.

-- Router A
| DLCI 100/e0 10.129.10.1/s0 nnumbered
|
|
|
-- Router B
DLCI 115/e0 10.129.20.1/s0 192.168.77.20

This is a frame-relay network that will ultimately be configured in a star configuration (all routers connect to Router A).

The circuit is up and running correctly. If I do not use the sub interfaces and leave s0 unnumbered I am able to see the rest of the network without a problem if the frame-relay map to Router B is added in Router A.

In reading Cisco's documentation, I was under the impression point-to-point would be the proper way to setup the interface since it was connecting to only a single point. Is this incorrect?

Thanks for your help and please let me know if additional information is needed.

Thanks again.



Jay
 
I've had issues when connecting from one router with a sub-interface config to another router without. Bottom-line is always use sub-interfaces so you can easily add more if the number on connections increases. I've never used the map command.

Another thing I thought of is the deleted status of the line. What is the speed of the line? If you have an integrated CSU/DSU, with a slower line, you may need a "service-module timeslots 1-6" line in the config.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top