Static Routing gone Bad!

[doohder]

Here is what I have for a network layout everything I kinda of in the testing phase right now since all the locations are not connected yet. So here is what I currently have workin I have all the Internal users going through the ISA server by setting the gateway of last resort to the ISA server on the routers which is 10.0.0.2. I have a wireless system that needs to stay a public address so I am trying to set up a static route out to the T1 router to no avail. When I put in static route in such as 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.0.1. It will kick the internal users off going through the ISA server. I guess what I am asking how to I build a static route to the 216.x.x.161 with out affecting the 10.x.x.x users.

 

[doohder]

what I am sayin say I have an interface of 216.x.x.177 which is on the t1 router and I have another leased address of 216.x.x.184 I put that into my laptop plug it in to the interface I can get on the net without nat. ....its a public address so is the one down on the eth1 of grand rios im just trying to build a map to get it to the other public addresses so packets dest. for that interface are seen by the internet a static route.

 

[doohder]

I don't believe you can nat a public address thats why I am tryin to statically route it around the ISA to keep it a public address

 

[SQL2KDBA69]

not going to happen. Only public address can talk to public address without NAT. Private address Needs NAT to communicate on the internet. no way around that.

 

[SQL2KDBA69]

NAT is only a translation from public to private and back to private. before NAT there was only Public address. meaning everybody had to buy a pool of public address for all there computer that want to communicate across the internet.