Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations IamaSherpa on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Start-end relation not effectuated

Status
Not open for further replies.

recumbentTom

Technical User
Jun 15, 2011
4
NL
MSProject 2003. A rather simple project, with several subprojects and a few normal tasks in the main project. One of the sub-projects has a start to end relation to one of the tasks in the main project. But the result is (consequently) that it starts at a specific date (3 months later). I did not fix this date as a starting date and I tried everything (I think) to let it start just after its predecessor (just as it should). The start-date is independent from the end-date of the predecessor. What can I do?
 
Hi Tom,

I don't understand completely. You have a inserted (linked?) subproject with a predecessor in the main project. Is it a Finish to Start relationship or a Start to Finish relationship?

Are there resources assigned to the task? Do they have different schedules (non-working time) in their calendar? Are the tasks in the subproject the first tasks? What is the start date of the project -- open the subproject (outside of the master) and check Project > Project Information. Is the project scheduled from a start date or an end date?

It should be scheduled from a start date and the Start date should be earlier than the finish of the predecessor for the predecessor to drive the date.

I hope this helps.
Julie
 
Hi Julie.
Thank you very much for your quick reaction. The start dates of the subprojects were different indeed.
Simple but stupid of me.

Tom
 
Hi Julie,
Just after my response to you I was glad with the solution, but there is still something wrong. I will explain the project/problem:
Project exists of: A-M-B-N-C-O-D-P-Q. All tasks are normally linked as start-after-end. MNOPQ are tasks in the main project. ABCD are inserted subprojects, linked from a file. No resources assigned (yet), so normal time scheduling. All projects have same calendar. What do you mean by "first tasks"? Project is scheduled from a start date. Every task scheduled/linked ASAP.
Just after your advise the tasks connected to each other in the right way. I did some testing (extending/shortening tasks) and it stayed OK, for a while. I restarted my PC because of a MS system update.
After this I did some testing again: M is 1 week, if I extend M to e.g. 1 month B shifts afterwards and stays connected. If I shorten M back to 1 week, B does not shift back. Same for the other combinations N-C and O-D. I would expect that all tasks follow each other ASAP and stay close to each other.
It looks like magic. I restarted my PC again (don't be misled, I don't know if there is a cause and effect!). Everything is connected except M-B (B stays firm in position).
Can you help me again?
Regards, Tom
 
Hi Julie,
I found the solution, although it seems strange to me.
I checked the start dates of the subprojectgs again. They were the same as they should be (the one of the main projectg). But I typed this same date anew, and everything changed to the situation that should be: so good connection between followers.
To me there seems to be no logic in this!!!!????
Problem solved, I hope. Until a new non-logical item comes up.
Regards,
Tom
 
Hi Tom,

Sorry for the delay getting back to you. What you note about dates not shifting as expected is well, unexpected. Double check that your calculation (Tools > Options, Calculation) is set to automatic.

Also, note that details on subprojects do not automatically "refresh" until you expand out the inserted subproject task.

Julie
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top