Hello,
I have a NW6 SP3 server with the Apache server with 2 network cards (one public, one private). This server runs WebAccess as well.
I changed the IP address of the public card following TID 10067853 (What do I need to modify when I change IP address on NetWare6) and TID 10067790 (Changing the IP address for the Enterprise Web Server on NetWare6).
All of the management stuff works as expected (both SSL and non-SSL ports). The non-SSL common port (80) works fine. I can get into the WebAccess interface and read my mail. What does not work is the standard SSL port (443). TCPcon shows the server listening on port 443 on both IPs. There are no errors from the startup of Apache or Tomcat. In Netscape 7.1, if I go to (can't do that with IE6!) I get the page unencrypted. If I try or I get that the connection has been terminated and some data may have been transmitted. If I telnet to port 443 and type "GET /" I get the proper page returned.
In the error logs, I get the warning:
handle-request reports: method without URI
Any ideas?
Mike.
I have a NW6 SP3 server with the Apache server with 2 network cards (one public, one private). This server runs WebAccess as well.
I changed the IP address of the public card following TID 10067853 (What do I need to modify when I change IP address on NetWare6) and TID 10067790 (Changing the IP address for the Enterprise Web Server on NetWare6).
All of the management stuff works as expected (both SSL and non-SSL ports). The non-SSL common port (80) works fine. I can get into the WebAccess interface and read my mail. What does not work is the standard SSL port (443). TCPcon shows the server listening on port 443 on both IPs. There are no errors from the startup of Apache or Tomcat. In Netscape 7.1, if I go to (can't do that with IE6!) I get the page unencrypted. If I try or I get that the connection has been terminated and some data may have been transmitted. If I telnet to port 443 and type "GET /" I get the proper page returned.
In the error logs, I get the warning:
handle-request reports: method without URI
Any ideas?
Mike.