I’m trying to set up a receptionist position where there are 3 DNs to manage, each with their own mailbox. The phone is a 3904. System is a brand new Option 11 with Succession 3.0 software and CallPilot 2.01. Here’s the situation.
1601 is the main call in line for one division (“RO”). During business hours, it should ring on the set, and go to an auto attendant after 4 rings if not answered. One of the menu choices will be to leave a message for the RO division. Additionally, this DN needs to be able to be forwarded to another DN if the receptionist is not there.
1804 is the main call in line for another division (“LC”). During business hours, it should ring at the send, go to AA after 4 rings. Again, there’s a menu choice to leave a message for the LC division. This DN does not need forward capability.
1894 is the personal DN for the receptionist. It was created to help keep personal and internal calls separate from inbound calls from the public. No special treatment here, just rings on the set, goes to voice mail after 4 rings.
Our phone vendor says this can’t be done without having at least 2 phones on the front desk (and then not even quite the way we want it), but I don’t agree. Here’s what I’m thinking.
1601 and 1804 can be SDNs in CallPilot to handle the time/day determination. If during business hours, the call would be transferred to 3601 and 3804 respectively (made-up DNs merely to present the calls to on the set). If not during business hours, the call would transfer to 1600 and 1803, SDNs containing the individual menus. After 4 rings on either 3601 and 3804, the call would also go to 1600 or 1803. Then, we can set up mailboxes 3601 and 3804, and have the appropriate menu choice drop the caller in express messaging for these boxes. To make it easy to distinguish where the messages are, the set could have an XMWK key for each of the mailboxes.
(Minor twist: is there any reason 3601 and 3804 couldn’t be MCRs, in case future call handling space is needed? This isn’t a big deal)
Does this make sense? Is there a better way to accomplish what we need? The way I see it, the only “strange” thing would be that the made-up DNs 3601 and 3804 would also need to be set up as a phantom TN to allow the hunting to 1600 and 1803, right?
Thanks, and I’ll be interested to hear what you guys think!
Matt
1601 is the main call in line for one division (“RO”). During business hours, it should ring on the set, and go to an auto attendant after 4 rings if not answered. One of the menu choices will be to leave a message for the RO division. Additionally, this DN needs to be able to be forwarded to another DN if the receptionist is not there.
1804 is the main call in line for another division (“LC”). During business hours, it should ring at the send, go to AA after 4 rings. Again, there’s a menu choice to leave a message for the LC division. This DN does not need forward capability.
1894 is the personal DN for the receptionist. It was created to help keep personal and internal calls separate from inbound calls from the public. No special treatment here, just rings on the set, goes to voice mail after 4 rings.
Our phone vendor says this can’t be done without having at least 2 phones on the front desk (and then not even quite the way we want it), but I don’t agree. Here’s what I’m thinking.
1601 and 1804 can be SDNs in CallPilot to handle the time/day determination. If during business hours, the call would be transferred to 3601 and 3804 respectively (made-up DNs merely to present the calls to on the set). If not during business hours, the call would transfer to 1600 and 1803, SDNs containing the individual menus. After 4 rings on either 3601 and 3804, the call would also go to 1600 or 1803. Then, we can set up mailboxes 3601 and 3804, and have the appropriate menu choice drop the caller in express messaging for these boxes. To make it easy to distinguish where the messages are, the set could have an XMWK key for each of the mailboxes.
(Minor twist: is there any reason 3601 and 3804 couldn’t be MCRs, in case future call handling space is needed? This isn’t a big deal)
Does this make sense? Is there a better way to accomplish what we need? The way I see it, the only “strange” thing would be that the made-up DNs 3601 and 3804 would also need to be set up as a phantom TN to allow the hunting to 1600 and 1803, right?
Thanks, and I’ll be interested to hear what you guys think!
Matt