This is the situation. Currently have one exchange 2000 server with one organization and one store. The public and private database is a combined 10GB and is growing but not exponentially. We want to create a 2nd exchange server that can take over as the exchange server in the event that the oringinal server dies. In essence a Recovery Server but we want to be able to restore the database to the 2nd server and then go ahead and have users connect.
Along with that we have a SAN that we can use. I want to be able to use the SAN and move the databases to the SAN partitions that are available and then be able to have the second server either use the same database or at least be able to restore from the database.
I have explored the cluster option and that is not a viable option due to the astronomic costs.
Another option I am exploring is creating a new forest and building a new exchange server with the same config and nameing of the server/organization/group etc. But the issue I have with this is that I do not have access to the users that are on my other forest with the live server. I would have to create each user on the new AD and maintain it constantly. And even if I could do this I can't move the server object between forests. I thought of maybe building the server to the point where it has a blank database and then leaving it alone. Then in the event of any emergency I can physically take that server which is an exact duplicate of the orginal exchange server and change the domain or rather have it join the domain where the orginal server was. BUT then there will be issues with the SID's not matching on the AD. So I am at my wits end.
Am I forced to go with a cluster? We have a 60 min window where we can be down after that I am pretty much out of job once the servers are recovered.
Any suggestions are welcome.
Along with that we have a SAN that we can use. I want to be able to use the SAN and move the databases to the SAN partitions that are available and then be able to have the second server either use the same database or at least be able to restore from the database.
I have explored the cluster option and that is not a viable option due to the astronomic costs.
Another option I am exploring is creating a new forest and building a new exchange server with the same config and nameing of the server/organization/group etc. But the issue I have with this is that I do not have access to the users that are on my other forest with the live server. I would have to create each user on the new AD and maintain it constantly. And even if I could do this I can't move the server object between forests. I thought of maybe building the server to the point where it has a blank database and then leaving it alone. Then in the event of any emergency I can physically take that server which is an exact duplicate of the orginal exchange server and change the domain or rather have it join the domain where the orginal server was. BUT then there will be issues with the SID's not matching on the AD. So I am at my wits end.
Am I forced to go with a cluster? We have a 60 min window where we can be down after that I am pretty much out of job once the servers are recovered.
Any suggestions are welcome.