Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations IamaSherpa on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Question about simulations and MS exams

Status
Not open for further replies.

kmcferrin

MIS
Jul 14, 2003
2,938
US
I've always wondered exactly how the simulations are scored on the MS exams, and I haven't had any yet (only MS exam so far was 70-270). I'm sitting the 70-290 in a couple days and just want to be prepared.

I have been doing the TestOut training material for all of my certs so far and they all have had extensive simulations. It seems like the simulations in the TestOut material score you based on whether what you have done would result in the correct configuration rather than what path you took to get there. This includes the ability to "make mistakes" like going into the wrong part of the administrative tools, seeing that you're not where you want to be, then going into the correct area. Are the actual simulations similarly forgiving, i.e., as long as the final result is correct is the question considered correct?

One other thing, has anyone else used the TestOut materials for 70-290? Like I mentioned, I have used them for the the 70-270 and the CompTIA A+, Net+, Server+, and Security+ tests and found them very helpful. But I am really not liking the 70-290 material. It seems like the presenter doesn't know the material very well, and he frequently mis-speaks and then corrects himself. I have also found a couple of instances where there were questions in the chapter review tests about commands not mentioned in the chapter material. Anyone else have any thoughts?
 
I've recently lost faith in MeasureUP software due to some problems with their 70-294 test software, but for 290 and 291 they were pretty good.

Using testking can be pretty dicey, from what i've heard the majority of their explanations are wrong, and exam content has been updated so you can't just memorise the exam, not a bad blue print for the exam structure though if your willing to put the study time in on the books too?!

Would highly recommend Transcender though, using it for my 297 exam at the moment and i really feel i'm making progress a lot quicker.

Not sure but I think the only simulation question I had in 290 was a volume shadow copy one, enabling it and making the client available, was a while back though so i'm not sure!

Hope thats helpful in some way!

A+,N+,S+,Security +,MCP,MCSA
70-270-passed
70-290-passed
70-291-passed
70-293-passed
70-294-passed
70-297-pending
70-298-pending
70-299-pending
 
Looks like we're on the same path, except I'm doing the 70-299 this week, then going back for the 293, 294, and 298. I would think that doing them in order is the best method, but the MCSA:Security requirements list the 299 exam, and you need not do the other three to get the MCSA. Anyone else think that's odd?

________________________________________
CompTIA A+, Network+, Server+, Security+
MCP, MCSA 2003
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top