QSIG trunking between Nortel Option 11C and Cisco Call Manager

[uofm]

A little backgroung information. I have an option 11C Rls. 4.5 that we are looking to integrate with a Cisco Call Manager via QSIG trunking. I have package 263 which is the basic QSIG package but do not have packages 305 QSIGGF or 316 QSIG-SS. I have yet to find an example or site currently in production where the interface type for the d-channel is not ISGF. Without package 305 that is not possible but the interface type can be built as ISIG. So, has anyone been successful with QSIG trunking to a call manager with an ISIG interface instead of ISGF. Also, what functionality would you lose being built as ISIG instead of ISGF if it can be done. There are seperate voicemail systems so no message waiting indicators would be involved. We're really just looking for 4 digit dialing between the sights along with name display. Thanks. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

 

[allenmac]

If you don't want to do QSIG, you can use NI-2, I helped a buddy set this up between an Option 11 and Cisco last week. It was straightforward on the Option 11 side.

 

[oldestgeek]

You should be fine setting it up as ISIG or NI-2. I think the only thing you would lose is the ability to light lamps on the other system but it sounds like you don't need to do that anyway.

 

[fallenangel1]

I had replica case. Tried ISIG but it was giving me problems, invalid IE issue. I then changed to ESIG and lo... things got perfect. Here is my RDB Print for any sort of ease:


>ld 21
PT1000

REQ: prt
TYPE: rdb
CUST 0
ROUT 2*
ROUT 12

TYPE RDB
CUST 00
ROUT 12
DES
TKTP DID
TW_ROUTE NO
NPID_TBL_NUM 0
SAT NO
RCLS EXT
VTRK NO
NODE
DTRK YES
BRIP NO
DGTP PRI2
ISDN YES
MODE PRA
IFC ESIG
SBN NO
PNI 00000
NCNA NO
NCRD NO
ISAR NO
CPFXS YES
DAPC NO
INTC NO
MBXR NO
DSEL VOD
PTYP DCO
AUTO NO
DNIS NO
DCDR NO
ICOG IAO
RANX NO
SRCH LIN
TRMB YES
STEP
ACOD 87
TCPP NO
TARG
CLEN 1
BILN NO
OABS
INST
MFC NO
ICIS YES
OGIS YES
PTUT 0
TIMR ICF 512
OGF 512
EOD 13952
NRD 10112
DDL 70
ODT 4096
RGV 640
FLH 510
GTO 896
GTI 896
SFB 3
NBS 2048
NBL 4096
DTD NO
SCDT NO
2 DT NO


PAGE 002

DDO NO
DRNG NO
CDR YES
INC YES
LAST YES
QREC YES
OAL YES
AIA YES
OAN YES
OPD YES
NDP EXC 0
CDRX YES
NATL YES
SSL
CFWR NO
IDOP NO
MUS NO
PANS YES
EQAR NO
TDET NO
TTBL 0
ATAN NO
PLEV 2
OPR NO
PRDL NO
EOS NO
DNSZ 0
RCAL NO
MCTS NO
ALRM NO
BTT 30
ACKW NO
ART 0
PECL NO
DCTI 0
TIDY 87 12
SGRP 0
ARDN NO
AACR NO


Go For It Even If It's Impossible !


LinkedIn Profile:

http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=64864659&trk=tab_pro

 

[fallenangel1]

Cisco was using Net5 as far as I remember, but I will confirm the Cisco side tomorrow.

Go For It Even If It's Impossible !


LinkedIn Profile:

http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=64864659&trk=tab_pro