Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations strongm on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Proper name for the "at" sign

Status
Not open for further replies.

jrbarnett

Programmer
Jul 20, 2001
9,645
GB
The sign "@" used in email addresses is always known as the at sign, or at symbol.

Is there a proper name for it?
(along the lines of & is ampersand; ^ is caret, * is asterisk etc).

John
 
Oh lord, now I've started something..., but in for a penny in for a pound.

Since we're defining a shorthand language, we would want to shorten the most commonly occurring character sequences to a single stroke, so

^ could mean repeat the last character (saves on double characters)
$ for "ing"
& for "th"

We can also compound, so a word like "the" would become "{&}"

So {&}n {&} {t}(x) (s)a(r)s to g(e) v{r} i{(n)}{r}(s)$, {&} {t}(x) wil^ g(e) v{r}y od^ inde^d!
 
So you would replace a three letter word with ..er.. a three letter word ?
 
Yes, why using (), [], {} or <> if )]}and > would do?

I also see no benefit in ^ for repeating the last character. Even taking into account, that you don't want to save characters/bytes/ram, but ink/paper.

Bye, Olaf.

PS: this message was written with recycled electrons.
 
This is gre(a)

anything would {b} any&$ and hinge would be h{$}
so{m} sav$ {{&}r} {m}&inks

(i) could take we^s to {d}cip{h} a po(s)

By {&} t{} {w} ha{e} finis{h}d, I wo(n) un{d}r(s)and
{Si{l}(n)Aich} @ all

If (i) could ha{v} go{n} wrong earl{i}r and (i) did(n), (i) u(l){(a)}ly would ha{v} {{b}}n {b}{n}ficial for (i) to ha{v}." : Murphy's U(l){(a)} Corol^ary

"If it could have gone wrong earlier and it didn't, it ultimately would have been beneficial for it to have." : Murphy's Ultimate Corollary
 
So you would replace a three letter word with ..er.. a three letter word ?

Err... in a word no. You're um... missing the point here.

This is shorthand, where its the number of penstrokes that is important. The idea is that if you replace "at" with a single pen stroke like @, you could also add similar penstrokes to certain letters, so then you dont have to write the others. G(e) (i)?



 
Hey snuv,

your name already is an abreviation of "it's enough", isn't it?

Bye, Olaf.
 
If {w} cap(i)ali{s}d {&} {l}{t^}r, {w} could have {&} p{r}{c}d$ {l}{t^}r {r}pla{c}d

eg (a) = at and (A) would be ta

Olaf

Sadly not. I couldnt think of a handle so used my cat's name
He was named by my mother who is a Dr Suess fan

Snuv

If (i) could ha{v} go{n} wrong {A}rl{i}r and (i) did(n), (i) u(l){(a)}ly would ha{v} {{b}}n {b}{n}ficial for (i) (O) ha{v}." : rphy's U(l){(a)} Corol^ary

"If it could have gone wrong earlier and it didn't, it ultimately would have been beneficial for it to have." : Murphy's Ultimate Corollary
 

{m}$inks &(i)s is g(t^)$ hard{R} (O) (F)nd {X}[a]p(l)s

I wish I handnt started this.


 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top