Does anyone have experiance with both or either of these Servers? I currently have a Proliant 1500 and its been good. Concerns are for the future and growth. Currently have 20 clients and am moving towards 40 with WEB access/hosting in mind. I realize they are both probably overkill for me at this time. Any thoughts?
Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations strongm on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Proliant 3000 vs. HP LH3 advice Request.
- Thread starter blackcat
- Start date
Well Compaq is axing the 3000 because they are still highly parallel processing.....and most of the server world is smp.....Depends on what ur looking for...Compaq is cutting up their servers line between rack mount models and non rack mount models..<br><br>I like the ml370 for pedestal and the dl380 for rack.....both r formerly Proliant 1600's <br>The proliant 16000 was one the most reliable, fault tolerent servers on the market today.Both ML and DL r still dual smp...If u need quad proc's look at the 5500 or the 6400.......
- Status