ArchibaldJCox
Vendor
Hi all,
I'm currently in the process of changing out an Option 21E to an Option 11C running Succession 3.0 software. I've done about 15 of these in the last month and this is the first major snag I've hit.
In the 21E the DCH and RDB were programmed with IFC NI2. The TKTP of the RDB is TIE, as is the TYPE for the associated trunks. When I try to configure the Option 11C in the same manner, I encounter a few problems. The DCH is programmed the same as it was. In the RDB, when I hit prompt IFC and enter NI2 it comes back with CBCR (Service Route Indicator), to which I must say YES. Then it asks for RTN (The number of the ISA master Route), which I do not have configured, as the old PBX didn't have one.
How can I make the Option 11C work like the Option 21E?
Here is the DCH, RDB, and a trunk from the 21E:
I was wondering if it would still work to just configure the trunks and route as DID instead of TIE?
The other problem is, I can't exactly test the functionality of a config because the Option 11C is sitting in a Lab in a different state.
Thanks in advance!
Arch
I'm currently in the process of changing out an Option 21E to an Option 11C running Succession 3.0 software. I've done about 15 of these in the last month and this is the first major snag I've hit.
In the 21E the DCH and RDB were programmed with IFC NI2. The TKTP of the RDB is TIE, as is the TYPE for the associated trunks. When I try to configure the Option 11C in the same manner, I encounter a few problems. The DCH is programmed the same as it was. In the RDB, when I hit prompt IFC and enter NI2 it comes back with CBCR (Service Route Indicator), to which I must say YES. Then it asks for RTN (The number of the ISA master Route), which I do not have configured, as the old PBX didn't have one.
How can I make the Option 11C work like the Option 21E?
Here is the DCH, RDB, and a trunk from the 21E:
Code:
ADAN DCH 6
CTYP MSDL
DNUM 6
PORT 1
DES MYDCH
USR PRI
DCHL 17
OTBF 32
PARM RS422 DTE
DRAT 64KC
CLOK EXT
IFC NI2
CO_TYPE ATT
SIDE USR
CNEG 1
RLS ID 1
RCAP
T310 30
T200 3
T203 10
N200 3
N201 260
K 7
---
TYPE RDB
CUST 00
ROUT 6
TKTP TIE
ESN NO
CNVT NO
SAT NO
RCLS EXT
DTRK YES
DGTP PRI
ISDN YES
MODE PRA
IFC NI2
SBN NO
NCNA YES
NCRD NO
CHTY BCH
CTYP UKWN
INAC NO
ISAR NO
TGAR 0
PTYP PRI
AUTO NO
DNIS NO
ICOG IAO
SRCH LIN
TRMB YES
STEP
ACOD 806
TCPP NO
TARG
BILN NO
OABS
INST
ANTK
SIGO STD
TIMR ICF 384
OGF 384
EOD 5888
NRD 10112
DDL 70
ODT 4096
RGV 640
GRD 896
SFB 3
NBS 2048
NBL 4096
NRAG 30
TFD 0
DRNG NO
CDR YES
INC YES
LAST NO
QREC NO
OAL YES
AIA NO
OAN YES
OPD YES
NATL YES
MUS YES
MRT 10
EQAR NO
OHQ NO
OHQT 00
CBQ NO
AUTH NO
PLEV 2
ALRM NO
ART 0
SGRP 0
-------
TN 017 01
TYPE TIE
CDEN SD
CUST 0
NCOS 0
RTMB 6 1
B-CHANNEL SIGNALING
TGAR 0
CLS UNR DTN WTA LPR APN THFD HKD
P10 VNL
TKID
DATE 7 JUN 1999
I was wondering if it would still work to just configure the trunks and route as DID instead of TIE?
The other problem is, I can't exactly test the functionality of a config because the Option 11C is sitting in a Lab in a different state.
Thanks in advance!
Arch