Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations Mike Lewis on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Programing Extension in Virtual LENS

Status
Not open for further replies.

sos2715

Technical User
Jun 30, 2003
119
US
NEAX 2400 IPX

I'm building about 100 DID extensions and 100 Virtual DID's
and I'm using the range 020000 - 020237 for DID's and 020240-020317 for VIRT LENS.

I can use any range for VIRT DID's correct as long as the LENS is used for DID?

I think I already know the answer but I wanted to double check.

I know I can start using 021240-021317 but I wanted to keep the VIRTS in the same LEN RANGE.

Thanks
Steve

Steve
 
You can use any available lens as a virtual just remember to assign TEC = 18 and once you start using a range of LEN's for virtuals do not put card in that slot. It is better to keep your virtuals in LEN's ranges XXX240 thru XXX317 though.
 
Remember also, that when building virtual extensions, if you want those extensions to appear on phones, the physical extension of the phone should be in the same MG as the virtual you built.

Now, before I get corrected, I know that the new cards and software get around this; but not everyone has new cards and software. :)



Just my 2¢

"In order to start solving a problem, one must first identify its owner." --Me
--Greg
 
This is a virtual PIM that I'm building these extensions so I can't slot any cards. We purchased it because we're adding more IP phones.

Any special instructions I need to know about VIRT PIMS?

Steve

Steve
 
OK - Stupid question alert - I'm new to NEC, but not new to phone systems in general. Why do you want to keep your virtual extensions on those LENs?
I do have a couple of 2400s that I inherited, and work to maintain. Thanks for any help you can provide.
 
rickfromgb:

Do you mean why do you want to keep the virtual extensions on the same MG's (Module Groups) as the physical extensions that they're going to appear on?

Simple... the older 2400's would allow an appearance of a virtual extension on a station in a different module group.

Very frustrating to work out the symantics of that one in a LARGE system.



Just my 2¢

"When I die, I want people to say 'There was a wise man' instead of 'Finally, his mouth is shut!'" --Me
--Greg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top