I guess i'm part of the "don't drop your prices for HTML/CSS work" Camp.
Why, every Tom, Dick and Josephine knows how to code HTML, they also know every way to fu*k it up.
If you want quality you pay for it.
A client has the option of going for a $10/hr designer who might churn something out in Frontpage, or they can pay $30/hr to a designer who will code quality work.
I know which I would choose! At the end of the day I want a job done right.
I also agree that it's time that you should be paid for. If something is difficult (database work etc) then it takes longer, but I don't really see why someone should get paid more for a page produced in PHP rather than HTML/CSS.
Time is money!
What if a site should be done in something like PHP but can also be produced with just HTML, will a client request the site be done in HTML cos it's $20/hr cheaper? it may take you as long, in fact it might even be more awkward to create
as you lose the site-maintenance-speed-benefit of server side technologies.
Just a thought!
- É -