Jonsi,
Thanks for kind comment about my postings! ...And THANKS for your "high RANK-ing" solution. The RANK function is a GOOD one to know about, and worthy of a "STAR".
Interestingly, the RANK solution provides the "correct" results in a situation where the teacher/examiner wants to "skip" ranks, based on the number of participants who "tie". This of course takes into account the total number of participants.
In my example, using your RANK function - as follows =RANK(A2,$A$2:$A$9,1) ...produces the following results: The three 20-mark scores are ranked as "1", the three 40-mark scores are ranked as "4", the 45-mark score is ranked "7", and the 65-mark score is ranked "8". These results are possibly "preferable" in the majority of situations.
In some situations, however, I suppose the teacher/examiner might want to use my alternative solution. It shows the three 20-mark scores as ranked "1", the three 40-mark scores ranked as "2", the 45-mark score ranked "3", and the 65-mark score ranked "4". It therefore doesn't "skip ranks".
Vaughn9,
If you use Jonsi's RANK function with my example as described above - =RANK(A2,$A$2:$A$9,1) - the "ranking order" will start with "1" at the top. - i.e. the marks will be ranked from "top to bottom".
If, however, you change the "1" to a "0" - i.e. =RANK(A2,$A$2:$A$9,0) - then your "range of marks" (A2 to A9 in this case), will be ranked in "reverse order" - bottom-to-top. Thus, the 65-mark will be ranked "1", the 45-mark will be ranked "2", the three 40-marks will be ranked "3", and the three 60-marks will be ranked "6".
Hope this helps. Please advise if there are still questions.
Regards, ...Dale Watson dwatson@bsi.gov.mb.ca