Rainman,
The quick answer to your question "How could I use PNNI in this situation to setup something dynamic to solve this?" is that you may not be able to in your case.
It depends mostly on where your passport ATM interfaces sit in the whole data path. If, for instance, your ATMIF/10 is a single (non-redundant) connection point from a customer, or a carrier, then there may be no point using a dynamic routing protocol like PNNI, as ATMIF/10 is always a single point of failure (SPOF). If, however, your ATMIF/11 etc gives you multiple egress points (and/or you don't care about ATMIF/10 being a SPOF) for your next hop, then you need to understand whether your passport will be initiating an SPVC to other passports etc in your network, or if you are just supporting a 'passed through' switched connection from somebody else (and in which case you need to support the PNNI signalling/addressing from the customer/carrier). The latter description is less likely, because supporting someone else's addressing scheme is like supporting their IP routing - would you want a fault in your routing to be able to affect your carrier/customer, or vice versa? You don't have to SHARE the same addressing, but you will need to establish a gateway functionality - a bit like BGP, I suppose. Anyway, it's a lot of planning work for possibly not much return. What is the alternative to ATMIF/11? Is ATMIF/11 your primary carrier, and the alternative interface is another carrier? If so, what do you expect to happen in the event of a failure - how do you want the second carrier to handle ATM routing? How long would it take you to identify a fault and simply repoint the existing NRP?
If you're set on PNNI, you must get hold of Nortel's manuals - the NTPs. Don't take no for an answer from your local support folks - make them earn their money. Tell them if their web page and documentation wasn't so crap (compare it with Cisco.com!) you wouldn't have to bug them. Look into PNNI in NTP 241-5701-702 "ATM Routing" and NTP 241-5701-710 "Configuration Guide".
If you want to provide some more info on what you want to have happen over the whole data path (not just switching cells out a different interface), I/others may be able to supply some more definite answers...