I have several routes defined, and one of them is composed of 3 T1-s (giving me 72 outgoing lines). This is in a 2-stack 2400ICS. I don't remember where I heard this, but apparently, it's optimal for the system to have trunk 1 of the route the closest to the CPU, trunk 2 is next, and the increasing numbered trunks are further away from the CPU.
In other words, I shouldn't have trunk 1-24 in stack 2, and trunk 25-48 in stack one, and then trunk 49-72 somewhere else in a sporadic spot.
So I re-arranged my 72 trunks yesterday according to this theory: 1-24 are closest to the CPU: in stack 1, PIM 2. Then 25-48 are right next to it, to the right. Then 49-72 in stack 2 (the only place where there was a slot available).
But now what I'm seeing is that the most used T1 by the system is the last one: 49-72.
Has anybody ever heard of "optimal layout of the trunks" or I'm just dreaming this all up?
If there is an optimal layout, what would that be?
In other words, I shouldn't have trunk 1-24 in stack 2, and trunk 25-48 in stack one, and then trunk 49-72 somewhere else in a sporadic spot.
So I re-arranged my 72 trunks yesterday according to this theory: 1-24 are closest to the CPU: in stack 1, PIM 2. Then 25-48 are right next to it, to the right. Then 49-72 in stack 2 (the only place where there was a slot available).
But now what I'm seeing is that the most used T1 by the system is the last one: 49-72.
Has anybody ever heard of "optimal layout of the trunks" or I'm just dreaming this all up?
If there is an optimal layout, what would that be?