I would like to install XP on a new machine. It will have one big hard disc of about 180 Gb. I would like to have just two partitions - C: for programs and data and
Z: XP
I want C: because it is easy to install programs which insist on C: etc
I want XP out of the way. So my question is - is there any reason why I should not (or would not be able) to install XP on Z: (ie at the end of the alphabet rather than at the beginning) ?
I should also mention that I will run a small LAN - this machine and one other - files synchronised between the two with this new one being the master.
I would also like to use Paragon DriveBackup to take a backup to enable me to restore from DVD if ever I needed to.
Does all this sound reasonable ?
Z: XP
I want C: because it is easy to install programs which insist on C: etc
I want XP out of the way. So my question is - is there any reason why I should not (or would not be able) to install XP on Z: (ie at the end of the alphabet rather than at the beginning) ?
I should also mention that I will run a small LAN - this machine and one other - files synchronised between the two with this new one being the master.
I would also like to use Paragon DriveBackup to take a backup to enable me to restore from DVD if ever I needed to.
Does all this sound reasonable ?