I own a small consulting company with 7 employees, most of which are out on the road. Right now we have 2 incpming copper lines: 1 for calls, another for faxing.
When calls come in, a 3rd party answering service picks up after 3 rings if nobody picks up. The service then either takes a message and emails it to the mailbox owner, or sends a notification via email that a message is in their mailbox. All users can call an 800 number to retrieve their messages. Currently we pay about $180/month for the static DSL line and both copper lines. The answering service costs another $75/month, but every additional voice mailbox is another charge which is why we keep them to a minimum. Ideally I'd like to have 7-10 mailboxes, with no more than 3 phones inside the office since most everyone is on service calls.
Overall, here are my issues:
- The answering service is money wasted away when I know I can purchase my own equipment
- The quality of the answering service is very poor.
- Additional voice mailboxes can get expensive
- There is no call forwarding service
- All voice mails are automatically deleted after 2 days
Moving forward, I'm considering investing in my own phone system with these features:
- Auto-attendant
- Unlimited voice mail boxes
- LAN-based (so we don't have to lay additional CAT-3 cabling)
- Call forwarding (e.g. to cell phones, for example)
- Rack-mountable (since we already have a 42U rack)
- WAV file capability (nice to have, but not mandatory)
- Scalability (e.g. analog to digital), ability to take multiple copper phone lines (if we stick with analog)
I know I can easily buy a analog system for under $1000, but I'm getting so many different answers about what to do.
Some say stick with analog because my current static DSL doesn't provide enough pipe for VOIP (others say differently), others are suggesting a hybrid system which starts as analog, but can convert to VOIP.
Also, if I stick to analog, I'll definitely need at least another business line because if both lines are being used, all other incoming calls will get a busy signal which is no good. Would VOIP overcome that? As you can see, I'm having a difficult time even calculating cost/benefits.
If anyone has any suggestions, that'd be great.
When calls come in, a 3rd party answering service picks up after 3 rings if nobody picks up. The service then either takes a message and emails it to the mailbox owner, or sends a notification via email that a message is in their mailbox. All users can call an 800 number to retrieve their messages. Currently we pay about $180/month for the static DSL line and both copper lines. The answering service costs another $75/month, but every additional voice mailbox is another charge which is why we keep them to a minimum. Ideally I'd like to have 7-10 mailboxes, with no more than 3 phones inside the office since most everyone is on service calls.
Overall, here are my issues:
- The answering service is money wasted away when I know I can purchase my own equipment
- The quality of the answering service is very poor.
- Additional voice mailboxes can get expensive
- There is no call forwarding service
- All voice mails are automatically deleted after 2 days
Moving forward, I'm considering investing in my own phone system with these features:
- Auto-attendant
- Unlimited voice mail boxes
- LAN-based (so we don't have to lay additional CAT-3 cabling)
- Call forwarding (e.g. to cell phones, for example)
- Rack-mountable (since we already have a 42U rack)
- WAV file capability (nice to have, but not mandatory)
- Scalability (e.g. analog to digital), ability to take multiple copper phone lines (if we stick with analog)
I know I can easily buy a analog system for under $1000, but I'm getting so many different answers about what to do.
Some say stick with analog because my current static DSL doesn't provide enough pipe for VOIP (others say differently), others are suggesting a hybrid system which starts as analog, but can convert to VOIP.
Also, if I stick to analog, I'll definitely need at least another business line because if both lines are being used, all other incoming calls will get a busy signal which is no good. Would VOIP overcome that? As you can see, I'm having a difficult time even calculating cost/benefits.
If anyone has any suggestions, that'd be great.