Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations TouchToneTommy on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

MVS variable length records ftp'ed to Unix

Status
Not open for further replies.

noggin

Programmer
Sep 20, 2000
7
GB
I've got a MVS mainframe file that has been FTPed to our Solaris system. The records are variable and contain packed decimal and binary data so I've got to do any EBCDIC/ASCII conversion field by field, also I can't rely on the end of record being marked by line feed in the usual Unix fashion. Each record is preceded by a 4-byte record length field (RDW in mainframe terminology). I'm using Fujitsu COBOL and have coded -
01 in-record.
02 in-rdw pic 9(4) comp.
02 filler pic xx.
02 in-data pic x occurs nnn to nnn depending on in-rdw.

The record length (in binary) seems to be in first 2 bytes of the prefix field. Field in-rdw contains the length of in-data PLUS 4. So the system reads in the first record OK plus the first 4 bytes of the second record, hence all subsequent records are garbage. Anybody else had this problem? [sig][/sig]
 
noggin -

Yes, I have had a similar problem. First, transfering packed data does not work. We convert everything to PIC 9 before the transfer. It seems that ftp thinks one of the packed characters is a crlf character. Secondly, we have had no luck with transfering variable length records. There really isn't a UNIX equivalent. We have two job streams (COBOL) that run half on the mainframe and half on UNIX - all of our files are fixed length with no packed data.

Sorry for the bad news, if you post this question in the general UNIX forum you might get a better response. [sig]<p>Christopher Devenny<br><a href=mailto:c_devenny@yahoo.com>c_devenny@yahoo.com</a><br><a href= > </a><br> [/sig]
 
Don't use the Ocurs Depending on. Instead code a Pic X area large enough for th elargest record, then code:

Record Length Varying Depending on in-rdw. That will fix you right up. [sig][/sig]
 
On the mainframe the RDW is hidden, the system routines return the correct record although you still have to decode it using a record type etc. To transfer character data (ie. 'flat' or 'visible', typical PC/UNIX) FTP will obviously work, for packed and binary data (ie. typical mainframe) it WON'T, you need a proprietary solution like Connect Direct (both the sending AND receiving systems need the sofware ie. CD for MVS & CD for Unix, expensive!). When your Unix program reads the transferred file you get the whole record. So say the RDW (bytes 1-2 actually contain the count, ignore 3-4) contains 228, this is the length of the data (224) PLUS the rdw itself (4), if you coded -
01 REC
02 RDW PIC X(4)
02 REDEFINES RDW
03 LRECL PIC 9(4)BINARY
03 FILLER PIC XX
02 DATA PIC X OCCURS 0 TO 999 DEPENDING ON LRECL

then you would actually read 232 bytes ie. 4 bytes into the next record - PROBLEM!!!. One (only?) solution is to use C byte-stream routines, these come with Microfocus (Merant?) COBOL and Fujitsu COBOL, possibly other vendors. Routines you need to CALL are CBL_OPEN_FILE, CBL_READ_FILE, CBL_CLOSE_FILE (lots of others too). Procedure is -
1. call CBL_OPEN_FILE, set read function to 'filesize'
3. call CBL_READ_FILE to get file size in bytes
3. set read function to 'i/o', set offset to 0,
4. call CBL_READ_FILE to read next 4 bytes, get lrecl
5. add 4 to offset and call CBL_READ_FILE read next (lrecl) bytes ie. the data
6. process data
7. add lrecl to offset and repeat from 4.
8. End-of-file is when the offset reaches the file size, then call CBL_CLOSE_FILE.

Sounds fiddly but actually works well. Hope this helps.
Alternatively knock up a routine in C yourself, not too difficult.












 
HI - had this problem years ago, when we were transfering data from the mainframe to a Unix box. We now run Merant(MicroFocus) cobol on an AIX RS/6000. When we did it, there was no automated tool, so we had to write a program on the mainframe side to unpack the packed decimal, however we were able to leave the variable length records alone and that worked fine. The company SYNCSORT now has a bunch of utility programs they have created to automate the transfer process better. I would also recommend using their sorting package on the UNIX box. It sped up the sorts by 3X. Good luck on your conversion. [sig][/sig]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top