Hi all, hope someone can lend a bit of help on this one.
Setup is this. Win 2003 Server acting as VPN server behind Netgear DG834G router/modem. Clients connecting via Win XP Pro, SP1 over ADSL.
I have successfully managed to connect 2 seperate users to the server via a VPN connection. However they cannot connect simultaneously. When 1 user connects and another tries, the user gets to the 'registering computer on network' stage then it disconnects with message 'TCP/IP CP Reported Error 736. The remote computer terminated the control protocol'.
I have had a look at the event viewer log files on the server and get the following; 'The user COMP1/USER1 connected to port VPN 3-217 has been disconnected because no protocols were successfully negociated'.
Is this a limitation of the router in front of the server not being able to pass more than one simultanious connection through or an error in the RAS setup? Bit stumped as to where the fault lies and how to approach getting round it.
Any help/advice anyone can give would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Nell1
Setup is this. Win 2003 Server acting as VPN server behind Netgear DG834G router/modem. Clients connecting via Win XP Pro, SP1 over ADSL.
I have successfully managed to connect 2 seperate users to the server via a VPN connection. However they cannot connect simultaneously. When 1 user connects and another tries, the user gets to the 'registering computer on network' stage then it disconnects with message 'TCP/IP CP Reported Error 736. The remote computer terminated the control protocol'.
I have had a look at the event viewer log files on the server and get the following; 'The user COMP1/USER1 connected to port VPN 3-217 has been disconnected because no protocols were successfully negociated'.
Is this a limitation of the router in front of the server not being able to pass more than one simultanious connection through or an error in the RAS setup? Bit stumped as to where the fault lies and how to approach getting round it.
Any help/advice anyone can give would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Nell1