New to the forum, so no flaming please. We have 4 offices that we're looking at deploying the IPO to (actually 6 but one is connect via PTP T1, and the other is connect via DSL/wireless bridge out of my control).
Office A - Cisco 2651XM w/ VPN card IP+/FW ios w/ T1 to Verio ISP
Office B - Cisco 1720 w/ VPN card IP+/FW ios w/ T1 to Verio ISP
Office C - Cisco 1720 w/ VPN card IP+/FW ios w/ T1 to Verio ISP
Office D - Cisco 1720 w/ VPN card IP+/FW ios w/ FR T1 (CIR 1.5) to Speakeasy ISP
We currently have no QOS running. Ping times vary w/ 32 byte packet -
Office A-B 41ms up to 250ms avg. 68(7 hops over public route)
Office A-C 60ms up to 450ms avg. 57 (8 hops over public route)
Office A-D 85ms up to 255ms avg. 98 (14 hops over public route)
We do some file sharing, printing, and video conferencing site-site, central db in Office A accessed frequently.
I understand the need for QOS, no problem. But I know it isnt going to help latency. We just had the tech out today to do the network assessment, he wasnt real positive. I understand what we're up against, but Im thinking we cant be the only ones who have tried this. Can anyone throw me a bone here? The tech said he's only worked one other job with VPN links??? All the others were using PTP links to other offices across the country! Thats some serious cash. If I propose that, it'll go over like a brick ****house.
Any ideas?
TIA
Office A - Cisco 2651XM w/ VPN card IP+/FW ios w/ T1 to Verio ISP
Office B - Cisco 1720 w/ VPN card IP+/FW ios w/ T1 to Verio ISP
Office C - Cisco 1720 w/ VPN card IP+/FW ios w/ T1 to Verio ISP
Office D - Cisco 1720 w/ VPN card IP+/FW ios w/ FR T1 (CIR 1.5) to Speakeasy ISP
We currently have no QOS running. Ping times vary w/ 32 byte packet -
Office A-B 41ms up to 250ms avg. 68(7 hops over public route)
Office A-C 60ms up to 450ms avg. 57 (8 hops over public route)
Office A-D 85ms up to 255ms avg. 98 (14 hops over public route)
We do some file sharing, printing, and video conferencing site-site, central db in Office A accessed frequently.
I understand the need for QOS, no problem. But I know it isnt going to help latency. We just had the tech out today to do the network assessment, he wasnt real positive. I understand what we're up against, but Im thinking we cant be the only ones who have tried this. Can anyone throw me a bone here? The tech said he's only worked one other job with VPN links??? All the others were using PTP links to other offices across the country! Thats some serious cash. If I propose that, it'll go over like a brick ****house.
Any ideas?
TIA