Hi,
I've just started with a company that are in the middle of migrating their Exchange 5.5 server to Exchange 2003. The guy I've replaced had set up the AD connector incorrectly and it has caused all sorts of weird things to happen. During our talks about how to fix the problems I had a thought regarding the way Outlook talks to Exchange. When you set up a new account in Outlook and point it at the Exchange server, how does it resolve the name? We are in a native environment - all 2K/2003/XP and they have the new Exchange server set up with the same name as the old Exchange server. Wouldn't this cause odd behaviour? Our main problem is that some users have been doubled up after an attempt to move their accounts to the new Exchange Server whereby they have Contacts and mailboxes. Deleting a contact seems to also delete the mailbox.
I'm guessing that because they have 2 Exchange servers named the same, this is what is causing them to see 2 instances of some mailboxes, each of them a full mailbox.
Any ideas?...
I've just started with a company that are in the middle of migrating their Exchange 5.5 server to Exchange 2003. The guy I've replaced had set up the AD connector incorrectly and it has caused all sorts of weird things to happen. During our talks about how to fix the problems I had a thought regarding the way Outlook talks to Exchange. When you set up a new account in Outlook and point it at the Exchange server, how does it resolve the name? We are in a native environment - all 2K/2003/XP and they have the new Exchange server set up with the same name as the old Exchange server. Wouldn't this cause odd behaviour? Our main problem is that some users have been doubled up after an attempt to move their accounts to the new Exchange Server whereby they have Contacts and mailboxes. Deleting a contact seems to also delete the mailbox.
I'm guessing that because they have 2 Exchange servers named the same, this is what is causing them to see 2 instances of some mailboxes, each of them a full mailbox.
Any ideas?...