In Windows Millennium I had quite an assortment of available font sizes, both TrueType and Bit Map. Now that displays with higher resolutions are available, I need to make the command line interface (CLI) known as the Command Prompt (or "DOS"
window larger too. For Win2000 and WinXP I have been using the "raster fonts" but even with the largest fonts the screen is still quite small on the larger resolutions. I still have legacy DOS applications, so I can't just stop using it, nor do I like the full-screen mode mentioned here thread96-92520 where you switch modes with Alt-Enter.
Here are the larger sizes available:
Raster Fonts:
10x16 Me (a lousy font, hard on the eyes)
10x18 Me, 2000, XP
10x20 Me
11x18 Me
12x16 Me, 2000, XP
12x20 Me
13x22 Me
16x12 2000, XP
Lucida Console only in 2000 & XP: (bold fonts 1 pixel wider)
11x18
12x20
14x24
17x28
22x36
43x72
Is there any difference, advantage or disadvantage to using the Lucida Console fonts? Apparently Microsoft is not adding to the Raster fonts, so it looks like the only solution available.
Here are the larger sizes available:
Raster Fonts:
10x16 Me (a lousy font, hard on the eyes)
10x18 Me, 2000, XP
10x20 Me
11x18 Me
12x16 Me, 2000, XP
12x20 Me
13x22 Me
16x12 2000, XP
Lucida Console only in 2000 & XP: (bold fonts 1 pixel wider)
11x18
12x20
14x24
17x28
22x36
43x72
Is there any difference, advantage or disadvantage to using the Lucida Console fonts? Apparently Microsoft is not adding to the Raster fonts, so it looks like the only solution available.