LAN vs WAN port on IPO

[cwhitmore]

All of my IPO 500's v6 are setup with LAN1 port. I've seen some posts that recommend using the WAN port instead. It looks like LAN1 and LAN2 both have the same QoS options. Is there any advantage to using LAN2?

 

[VoIPchic]

I'm totally lost. This are my new changes with no luck
the rule in the router 192.168.3.254 allows me to ping from data to voice 172. I created an ip routing usage: gateway: 172.70.70.254 This includes an ip route in IPO as follows:

1nd ip route
ip addr: 192.168.3.0
mask: /24
gatway: 172.70.70.254

IPO LAN1:
Lan 1: 172.70.70.5
mask: /24
gateway: 172.70.70.254

IPO LAN2:
lan 2: 192.168.3.55
mask: /24
gateway: 192.168.3.254

2nd ip route:
ip: 0.0.0.0
mask: 0.0.0.0
gateway: 192.168.3.254
lan 2

 

[amriddle01]

You have conflicting routes, you are putting routes in to route 172. taffic via the 192.168.3.354 gateway when according to the above you have the systems LAN2 port already in that address range, is LAN 2 connected to the network or not? If it is why route via a gateway? If not get it out of that range as it is breaking the routing, if it is remove all routes as the system already knows where to send the traffic as it's all local to one or the other LAN ports. The systems routing works great, I have never seen it not work.....well only when poorly/incorrectly programmed.

http://www.ipoffice.tel