Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations TouchToneTommy on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Keeping It Short 6

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dimandja

Programmer
Apr 29, 2002
2,720
US
One thing that struck me about (at least) American english, is the propensity to shorten everything.

September 11 is known as nine eleven.

There many other and better examples out there.
 
The second link posted by sleipnir214 does shed some insight into your question GummowN. It is worth the read.

One cannot argue the impact that Noah Webster had on the English language. We could, however, discuss forever whether that impact was positive or negative.

Good Luck
--------------
To get the most from your Tek-Tips experience, please read FAQ181-2886
As a circle of light increases so does the circumference of darkness around it. - Albert Einstein
 
color is better than colour in at least one context: it comprises one less letter to write or type.

<literarly aside>
Jasper Fforde has written a series of novels which recount the exploits of his heroine, Thursday Next. [They are, by the way, great fun to read. No overriding redeeming social value, but great fun to read.]

Part of the concept of the novels is that it is possible to physically enter works of fiction. The third novel, The Well of Lost Plots, takes place in the Great Library, where all versions of published works of fiction reside. The legal enforcement arm of the government of the Book World of the Great Library is an organization called Jurisfiction.

In the lowest sub-basement of the Great Library is the Text Sea, from which all words are trawled to use for new books. In one part of Well, Text Grand Central relays to the members of Jurisfiction a report from Text Sea environmentalists that stocks of the letter U are dangerously depleted. One of the Jurisfiction agents recommends eliminating U from unnecessary places in words like "colour" and "honour" to save stocks of the letter. A further suggestion is that the change only take place in some areas, in order to allow a cover story of geographical spelling differences.
</aside>


But to be specific, we don't play around with the English language. We play around with the American language.





Want the best answers? Ask the best questions!

TANSTAAFL!!
 
Why the hell do Americans love to play about with the English language?

And If I recall correctly if was 'us' english who changed many of our words from "..ize" to "..ise".
 
I've always been curious why the English have tolerated the French additions of the U's in "colour" and "honour" in the first place.

The Latin source for these words didn't have them.


Want the best answers? Ask the best questions!

TANSTAAFL!!
 
That's probably because French was the language of royalty and nobility throughout Europe. I believe the English learned to write French before someone decided English could be an acceptable and written language as well.
 
GummowN

Why the hell do Americans love to play about with the English language?

I understand the concept of progress, but how is color better then colour etc


It's not about better or worse, it's about evolution of the language. It's a natural process, and Noah Webster was a mere instrument of this process. If not him, someone else would. Probably many of us studied in school about a role of a single person in historical process. Nothing would have happen if the society hadn't been ripe for that.

And after a language left a continent or even a country, it's not a property of that country any more. You cannot copyright a language, and for a good reason. A language develops within the conditions and society where it is used almost like a specie of living creatures. Bring a few families of mice into a different climate, and if they survive, in years they might evolve into a somewhat different kind. There is no more single English any more, there are British English, American English, Australian English, Canadian English, French French, Canadian French, etc. And all of them love to play with their languages. That's how languages develop.

 
>It's a natural process, and Noah Webster

There's little natural about most of Webster's arbitary language alterations.
 
strongm,
First, you took it out of context, and second, it just seems that way. Some changes didn't survive, but some were accepted. This is a natural process. Always in history there is someone who seems to make some unnatural choices, like revolutions, and wars, and language reforms. But in general, we can see the history going in upward spirals - isn't that a natural process with all those people as instruments?
On the other hand, you are entitled to your own opinion.
 
Well put, stella740pl.

Susan
[green]Gramen artificiosum odi. [/green]
 
>Apparently americans speak with "lengthened or drawn-out vowels", I guess as opposed to the brits who speak with clipped and halting cadence

>it's just that in the UK all americans are drawling - just watch their parodies of americans

-true enough, but only to get back at the American parodies of us English![tongue]

I guess any of us only tend to take into account regional accents of the countries in which we live or with which we are very familiar.

"Your rock is eroding wrong." -Dogbert
 
>you took it out of context

Not at all. I was making an observation, not a criticism of your overall point about language evolution (with which I am happy to agree).
 
Fun to read articles, sleipnir! Groop, tung, who knew...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top