omegaamigo
MIS
I've read many IP routing examples where a single Layer 3 switch is used as the router in a network environment where all other switches are operating just at Layer 2. That's fine, I understand that.
However, what about if one has many Layer 3 switches?
Does one (a) simply choose one of the Layer 3 switches to be the router, or (b) do something more cunning, making use of the Layer 3 facilities of the other switches?
In the networks I'd be working in, the ports associated with each VLAN are fairly evenly scattered across all switches.
My thoughts on this stem from this problem: If one uses the simple approach of Choose Just One Switch To Be The Router, then all cross-VLAN traffic needs to pass across the LAN to that switch in order for routing to take place, which seems inefficient. As the size of the LAN grows, it becomes increasingly inefficient.
So, is the Just Choose One Switch To Be The Router approach the only option?
Comments welcome! Thanks.
However, what about if one has many Layer 3 switches?
Does one (a) simply choose one of the Layer 3 switches to be the router, or (b) do something more cunning, making use of the Layer 3 facilities of the other switches?
In the networks I'd be working in, the ports associated with each VLAN are fairly evenly scattered across all switches.
My thoughts on this stem from this problem: If one uses the simple approach of Choose Just One Switch To Be The Router, then all cross-VLAN traffic needs to pass across the LAN to that switch in order for routing to take place, which seems inefficient. As the size of the LAN grows, it becomes increasingly inefficient.
So, is the Just Choose One Switch To Be The Router approach the only option?
Comments welcome! Thanks.