snootalope
IS-IT--Management
Hello
I've been testing this NetFlow product recently to try and determine why our frame-relay lines contiune to get hammered (bandwidth wise).
After installing this product, it's obvious as ever whats going on. Metaframe (or connections on tcp 1494) are utilizing sometimes 100% of our lines, yet there's only 8 people in each office!! And the lines are fractional T1's with a CIR of 768k each.
Our network looks like this. The home office holds all the Citrix servers. Each remote office has nothing but dumb terminals that have ICA clients (Wyse Terminals w/ ICA 8.05).
Just in the recent hour, here's what I'm seeing. Metaframe traffic racks up 51% of the traffic with 45.4mb transfered. The next closest service is our VoIP system, which should be utilizing the most considering the QoS ans policing on the frame.
So, my question is. Is there anything I can do to compress or cut down the traffic of the ICA connections? I'm thinking, if my users down there have backgrounds with pictures of their cats and dogs or whatever, that'd add just that much more traffic to the screen packets being sent right??
I'm just wonding if there's anyone out there who's found an efficient way to manage the ICA traffic through out their WAN.
Thanks for any advice!
snooter
I've been testing this NetFlow product recently to try and determine why our frame-relay lines contiune to get hammered (bandwidth wise).
After installing this product, it's obvious as ever whats going on. Metaframe (or connections on tcp 1494) are utilizing sometimes 100% of our lines, yet there's only 8 people in each office!! And the lines are fractional T1's with a CIR of 768k each.
Our network looks like this. The home office holds all the Citrix servers. Each remote office has nothing but dumb terminals that have ICA clients (Wyse Terminals w/ ICA 8.05).
Just in the recent hour, here's what I'm seeing. Metaframe traffic racks up 51% of the traffic with 45.4mb transfered. The next closest service is our VoIP system, which should be utilizing the most considering the QoS ans policing on the frame.
So, my question is. Is there anything I can do to compress or cut down the traffic of the ICA connections? I'm thinking, if my users down there have backgrounds with pictures of their cats and dogs or whatever, that'd add just that much more traffic to the screen packets being sent right??
I'm just wonding if there's anyone out there who's found an efficient way to manage the ICA traffic through out their WAN.
Thanks for any advice!
snooter