I was wondering if any one can give me some clues on how can I add a Translation Rule (or Access rule) to allow a VPN user with public IP address of 83.x.x.x to access only one server with IP address of 192.x.x.x inside the PIX515e.
access-list outside-in permit ip 83.x.x.x 192.x.x.x
access-group outside-in in interface outside
Your static will depend on how the host 192.x.x.x should appear to the outside world. If you want it to appear as it's real address, you can do the following;
Hmm, i found out that after adding the lines in above post, our website was unreachable. So suspect the "any" was redirecting all traffic to x.x.x.x. Can someone confirm this?
Yes,
The any IP will allow all IP traffic to that destination and no other. The Statics actually do the redirection, the ACL just allows it to happen.
Just allow whatever you want specifically.
You want to change the ACL to allow the ip pool for your vpn users to access.
access-list outside-in permit ip 192.168.12.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0
access-list outside-in permit tcp any host External IP eq 80
- where 192.168.12.0 is the IP pool you gave your vpn users and 10/24 is the internal network.
It turns out that this PIX was setup with the older "conduit" method and the acces-list was overriding all the conduit's. I now see that the port forwarding can also be done with this list.
May I ask a similiar question with similiar senario but this time I would like to give access to an outside IP address of 83.x.x.x to access a server on the our DMZ with the ip address of 192.168.10.14 ?? I know it would be very similiar to the above but I would like to make sure I am applying the correct changes to the live PIX!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.